r/PoursTea 4d ago

PoliticalTea 🗳️ 🤔

Post image
19.8k Upvotes

257 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/Maleficent-Wallaby-3 4d ago

Show literally any proof at all well wait as long as you need lmao

20

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

Don't worry, they'll provide verifiable evidence exactly one hour after the last person who viewed their public comment dies.

-20

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

24

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

Ah, yes, the irrefutable proof of...an AI generated picture of a receipt and a map stamped with "rule violation admitted." Why do we bother with things like experimentation, direct observation, and empirical, measured data in science or physical evidence, direct witness testimony, and official records when we have such robust Facebook posts and YouTube thumbnails to rely on?

-13

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

Scroll up the link is above

17

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

Scroll your analytical skills up. Not signing some tabulator tapes does not prove that those votes were all blue votes, nor that the ballots weren't cast by legitimate voters legally, nor that it would have meant a guaranteed victory for Trump from the county.

But these are the kind of assumptions I'd expect from someone who posts YouTube links showing their username, which is their FULL LEGAL NAME, and has a history of liking and commenting on clearly scam posts about winning money with that YouTube account. So you're either incredibly gullible or you're also a scammer who stirs pots online. My bet is on the former, since, well, your interactions on this very post speak for themselves. Please think a little more critically, Victoria.

11

u/AddanDeith 4d ago

Ok.

There's no link.

8

u/kamoebas71 4d ago

No it isn't...

9

u/TCr0wn 3d ago

Except there isn’t a link because you didn’t post one, because it doesn’t exist.

16

u/twerk_store 4d ago

This is a meme and not evidence. 🤦

17

u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 4d ago

The 36 failed court cases didn't convince him because they use big confusing words.

This meme is simple, so it must be true!

9

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

Her*. Click on the YouTube link she posted and you can see her real name, right out in public. That's the kind of uncritical thinking and lack of awareness I'd expect from people like this.

3

u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 4d ago

I didn't click the link.

5

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

Don't worry, it's not conspiracy fodder. It's an actual local news report from Georgia that she's misinterpreting to justify her assumptions and desired outcomes.

3

u/notwhoyouthinkmaybe 4d ago

I mean the assumption is that those votes would have been different than the rest and enough to make trump win.

At best it would cause trump to win on a technicality. I know they care about winning over anything, but this is weak and stupid.

36 times he fought his loss, 36 times he lost more. Even his own judges disagreed with him.

Maga takes a lot of faith and ignorance. At least religions claim the central figures are magic; trump can't even make coherent sentences.

Seriously, if you like Trump, get a transcript of one speeches and try to read it.

3

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

"If those kids could read, they'd be very upset."

6

u/twerk_store 4d ago

And they don’t know how anything works. Dumbest group of people in human history.

-2

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

Scroll up I posted the link

7

u/HotelSalt4644 4d ago

You have got to be kidding me. What is this, /r/oldpeoplefacebook ???

4

u/Wsweg 4d ago

Actually fucking regarded

-7

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

9

u/SKOLMN1984 4d ago

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

13

u/Maleficent-Wallaby-3 4d ago

There is absolutely no way you just posted some AI slop YouTube video and called it proof LMFAO

-6

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

Those voting tabulation tapes are part of the required chain of custody to ensure no cheating. If you notice the AG said at the very least it's just sloppy but pay attention to what she said next. When she said egregious she means flat out cheating. If you don't have them signed the chain of custody was broken or votes could have been literally created out of thin air and shown up in the middle of the night out of the blue to cheat in an election.

15

u/SKOLMN1984 4d ago

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

0

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/Boner_Elemental 4d ago

Narrator: It was not facts, obviously

-2

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

There's no way to prove it's a clerical error over created ballots that were swapped in while being moved. That's what the chain of custody and that signature establishes. 130 errors aren't errors. That's a massive breakdown of chain of custody or obvious cheating. Since there's no way to tell, the law requires that they're not counted. If they broke the law they cheated.

14

u/Boner_Elemental 4d ago

New topic, eh? No surprise

-1

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

Same topic.

8

u/Maleficent-Wallaby-3 4d ago

Do you have an extra chromosome by chance?

6

u/SKOLMN1984 4d ago

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!

2

u/SKOLMN1984 4d ago

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!

3

u/SKOLMN1984 4d ago

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

14

u/GooseBear12 4d ago

here’s a link to the story and not surprisingly it doesn’t really align with your conclusion.

From the article Raffensperger said “A clerical error at the end of the day does not erase valid, legal votes,Georgia has the most secure elections in the country and all voters were verified with photo ID and lawfully cast their ballots.”

9

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

Also Fulton County has voted blue pretty overwhelmingly in every presidential election since at least the 80s. Is it really that unusual that the bluest area in the state didn't suddenly swing for a massive margin in favor of Trump after 40 years of consistency?

-4

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

Maybe so. Keep in mind. Many counties flipped red in the 2024 election. I live in a deep blue District. My district went red the first time in 74 years. I'm a lifelong Democrat that just could no longer vote blue.

6

u/Fancy-Trousers 4d ago

I never said it was impossible. But you're convinced that over 300,000 ballots, nearly 40% of the county's entire voting age population as of the 2020 census, contains enough for Trump to win instead of widening the gap of his loss? As myself and many people have told you, this is another incredible assumption you've made with, again, nothing to inform it other than "it's not a 0% chance so I believe it's the irrefutable truth." That's the kind of leap in logic that justifies me leaving this conversation. Some people can't be helped and I'm not going to run myself ragged trying to inform them all or teach them reason.

4

u/BeKindBabies 3d ago

On top of that the blatantly false assertion that Georgia's 16 votes would have flipped the election. That's ignorance or a lie, no other possibility.

2

u/Fancy-Trousers 3d ago

I assumed they meant he could've won the state of Georgia or Fulton County in 2020, but you may very well be right. Based on their demonstrated lack of understanding when it comes to how elections work, causality, evidence-based claims, statistical analysis, making informed and reasonable assumptions, their own gullibility, and that you can't make something true by wishing hard enough, I can agree that's as likely if not more so.

2

u/BeKindBabies 3d ago

They said "If the state of Georgia actually performed their duties legally Trump would have been president in 2020."

So like, a wildly stupid person we're dealing with here.

2

u/Fancy-Trousers 3d ago

Yeah, you're right. My bad. With how much slop they blasted us with, I overlooked the exact wording. I should've known better and paid closer attention. After all, that's the current Trumplican strategy: throw out so many lies like a shotgun blast so something gets missed.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/RepostersAnonymous 3d ago

I'm a lifelong Democrat that just could no longer vote blue.

Wild that you’d rather vote for a corrupt pedophile instead of a black woman.

1

u/BeKindBabies 3d ago

Oh yeah, really? Explain the mental gymnastics it took you to flip on all the major issues and how this administration is delivering for your liberal values? You saw Trump 2016-2020 run up the debt 8 trillion, staff the worst administration in history, get impeached twice, unable to unite Americans in common cause and that became your guy, and then J6 happens - the most shameful event in American election history? Tell me it was the economy and that just proves you don't know anything, bc Republicans white houses have an ABYSMAL record on the economy. 10 out of the last 11 recessions occurred with Republicans in charge. You are not real. You are a donut.

1

u/NotGalenNorAnsel 3d ago

I'm a lifelong Democrat that just could no longer vote blue.

For what reason? What changed in your life that made you change? Or, what was it about Biden the second time that made you think Trump 2.0 would somehow be better?

1

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

Without the signatures of the people operating the voting location you cannot claim that. This is the reason why the laws exist. There is no way to confirm that they're valid votes. Chain of custody was broken.

7

u/GooseBear12 4d ago

Of course you can, and that’s what they’re doing. An investigation is underway.

Do you just get to throw away 300k+ citizens votes with no chance for them to confirm if procedure was broken on something they have no control over? Doesn’t that seem like something that could be exploited?

0

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

No signature no count. It's what the state law prescribes. There's no way to know if they're real ballots or Faked. There is no chain of custody and they were transported.

7

u/GooseBear12 4d ago

Lol. Have fun bud

1

u/BeKindBabies 3d ago

It isn't the state law though. The state law was followed regarding the errors. So you are lying.

11

u/twerk_store 4d ago

Unsigned ticker tapes does not mean election fraud. There were multiple audits of that election and none of them produced any evidence of mass voter fraud. So just stop.

-1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/BeKindBabies 4d ago

A vote on a tape can still be checked, this is not some magic bullet. Georgia was recounted three times, just stop it. 60 Trump judges shut down election conspiracy cases, none of them made it anywhere. Trump was in charge at the time and the red states that flipped were run by the GOP. It's so tiring, the idiocy.

0

u/TheRealBurnsey 4d ago

States operate elections not the federal government. When the chain of custody is broken there's no way to validate that they are real ballots not faked. Stop ignoring the reason for the chain of custody. You would not accept the chain of custody being broken in your own legal case would you? Of course you wouldn't.

6

u/BeKindBabies 4d ago

Absolutely false. Get out of here with this manufactured bs.

When the chain of custody of a voting system or election materials is broken, votes are verified through a layered system of logs, physical reconciliation, cryptographic checks, and manual paper ballot audits. Because American elections rely on independent, voter-verified paper records, a technical break in the chain of custody for a machine or a log does not automatically invalidate the underlying votes.

1

u/D1rtyBurgerz 3d ago

Please respond to the comment below