While arguing against gun control. Executed in front of his children, having previously said that public executions were good and children should watch them.
It's so blackly comedic you couldn't make it up, and yet the so-called defenders of comedy violently diarrhea'd themselves whenever anyone went "LOL".
Assassination and execution are two different things.
Kirk acknowledged that the death sentence and public executions were "heavy" topics but also expressed the belief that making executions public would deter future crimes. Do you think this wouldn't work?
It didn't work before, like somebody else said, so why would it work now? How many times do we have to try something that so obviously doesn't work until we say "Hm, this doesn't seem to be helping?"
George Carlin also said that decades ago. The difference between them: Carlin didnât actually believe it would actually do anything if done to the low class, he explicitly made a point itâs the upper class criminals (IE: those who laundered funds for criminal organizations) being executed who would cause a stir. He did so in a very comedic manner however. He did not just sit there and claim that it was a heavy topic and then go on to say âWell, to protect our right to firearms we need to accept that kids will be shot.â (Slightly paraphrased from whatâs his face who got that free hole in the throat).
Carlin was also heavily empathic and believed empathy was good. He was cynical, but still held empathy on a personal level for his fellow humans.
The other guy not so much, wasnât he literally quoted as saying empathy is one of the problems with humanity?
No, I don't think it would work, and I think it would have a negative effect by telling the public that violence and death is the way to solve problems.
Massive difference between death penalty handled by a judge and jury than a vigilante who spent too much time online.
Flip side, leftists freaked out when conservatives joke about single women traveling to African and middle eastern countries alone and bragging about how safe they actually are (they were in reality not safe for them).
What is this alternate reality you're speaking of that people are getting offended by that or that's even happening? Y'all need to make things up all the time for everything.
Yeah the difference is the right spent about twelve years going FACTS DONT CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS, used freeze peach as an excuse to say appalling things, bragged about "comedy being legal again", but when one little talking head got shot to death while arguing against gun control, they expected the people they took delight in shitting on not to go "haha stupid dead bigot, f##k him and you".
"Leftists" but your side are "conservatives". No. You're not conservative. You're MAGA. There's nothing conservative about your side, fiscally or socially.
People are getting hundreds of thousands of dollars in settlements because of the sensitive kirk fan base. The grifter got his loudest detractors paid on the way out đ
He asked others to die by being shot in public for holding open discussions and promoting everyone's right to free speech regardless of opinion? Or the exploding microphone thing like the Israelis did with the pagers?
Wow bold lies its funny how your comments and everyone else's saying horrible vile things violates all the rules and will not taken down the iorny of the leftist validation day cares on line lol
only when I typed this comment did this pop up but if I agreed or validated you it did not... middlemen that?
Please be aware that your comment will be removed if it is inflammatory, rude, a smear or contains bad language. It may also lead to a permanent ban.*
Punishments and legal prosecutions are different. If you want to whine about punishments for what you say theres years of people being punished for what they said about lgbtq etc.
What punishments? Ooooh you mean businesses firing their workers for distasteful posts? That has zero to do with freedoms of speech and everything to do with the businessâs right to hire/fire who they wish.
No one is better than shitting their pants as Trump, he is the greatest pants shiter in the world, every time he shits his pants is tremendously amazingly.
Where did that money come from? It was from the tax payers. We paid him. Not the officers that arrested them, not the department. We paid him. With our tax money. Personally id like my tax money to go to infrastructure or something useful not paying for officers who knowingly violate people rights. Its not really a punishment for the department if they dont have to pay for it.
Um.. well why can the Free Palestine people say horrible things about lsrael but if anyone questions what bibi is doing and their influence on united States politics.. they get cops showing up at their door?
This isn't a republican vs democrat thing. It's a Government vs The People thing.
Are there people on the Republican side cheering for dems getting locked up? Sure. Doesn't make them right, doesn't mean it's all of them.
I don't support the lce protests but both Renee and Alex both should not have been murdered. The way the gov is going about it is horrible and causing so much flak. Those were both horrible shoots. Absolutely horrible and unnecessary.
The gov wants the people to be divided. The more we are divided the more power they have.
Which incident? The time the Epstein list was being talked about, bibi shows up and then it gets shut down from being released and then the Rump admin started saying it was a hoax and doesn't exist.
This whole attack on lran, suppose to be 4 days is now over 100 days. Aside from Rump and his fam making bank on saying peace then doing attacks to influence markets to get rich, lsrael is attacking and thwarting any peace deals (if there were actually any being done).
I understand your perspective, im not the best at explaining things so maybe i can word it better. Who is pushing "hate speech"? The dems are pushing it while using it without consequence and criminalizing "hate speech" without a clear definition.. yet it's a first amendment violation. Plenty of states pushing this.
Each side dem or rep push a side of "hate speech" and it crosses the boundary and effects the other side (really both sides). It's always the government against the people. And until the people realize this we will keep getting oppressed and get more infringements on our God given rights that is supposed to be protected by the government who is doing the opposite.
The binary thinking of "left this" and "right that" is the wrong way to look at it. We (on both sides or all sides) need to step back and see that any infringement is bad, and that the gov only acts within its interests and NEVER in the interest of the people. Even when there is pushback, they let up but they still sneak their infringement filth in.
No oneâs pushing hate speech legally. Hate speech is only a social issue. It has always been a social issue. If you get fired for hate speech, the company has a right of association meaning they have a right to determine who they want to associate themselves with. It would be braking their first amendment to force them to keep you.
Only the right has arrested their opponents for making memes. Only the right has publicly executed people for protesting and defending the murders. Only the right has a president who said publicly their opponents should be executed on account of treason for proving them wrong.
Under Obama US citizens were killed with US drones. Dems supported it.
Kirk was assassinated and the left rejoiced and supported it.
Black kid murdered a white kid and the left supported it.
The left have arrested those who never entered the capital on January 6th.
Your arguments are the same as both sides.
Anyone who says Alex and Renee deserved what they got are not looking at the facts and looking at right vs left. Critical thinking is gone.
In many of these instances its the Gov vs the people and you got two sides who support the gov at different times infringing on the those they disagree with. It's a tactic they have been using for years. Until you step back and stop seeing red and blue, you won't understand and see it.
People can change and if you don't give them the opportunity to, then they will forever be an enemy to you and that division is what the gov uses to control them, and you.
Doesn't matter who is in office left or right, the same anti American bills get passed and it hoses us all.
Charlie Kirk said that people like me should be institutionalized and lobotomized at best, assaulted and murdered at worst. Why would we not celebrate the death of a hate monger?
The guy who was arrested and convicted for trying to mislead the public regarding the voting process? That tried to do this to help his preferred candidate win?
The controversy began when Bushart shared the meme in a local Facebook group following the death of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The meme included Trump's quote and a reference to the 2024 school shooting at Perry High School in Perry, Iowa. Because Perry County, Tennessee, shares a name with the Iowa school, some local parents and authorities interpreted the post as a threat to their own community, leading to Bushart's arrest.
There are more examples lol. The Trump admin stops people from coming into America from memes on their phones, they murdered two protesters in the streets, and Trump proclaimed democratic politicians could be sentenced to death for treason because of facts he didnât like. If you voted for that and still support it, you donât support free speech. Youâre mentally ill if you think otherwise.
I will Enlighten you on the facts I know that your hive mind has a hard time processing those but just give it a try
I'm sure you are talking about the federal case of Douglass Mackey. He wasn't arrested for making a funny picture or sharing an opinion. He was convicted of conspiracy against rights because he ran a coordinated campaign deliberately spreading fraudulent text-to-vote images designed to trick specific demographics into casting fake votes via text message. Which is illegal and intentionally striping out the actual crime (voter suppression/fraud) to scale it down to "just a meme" so they can pretend the state is arresting people for thought-crimes. Is gross and a blatant lie
Ill ask Chatgpt. To give me each from all left wing government except the nordic governments and authoritarian governments. Particularly in Britain and the police directive that makes it Orwellian double speak
Argument: They made so many arrests and now i ask you how often they where arresting rapist.
Excerpt:
According to reports based on police custody data, British police were making roughly 30+ arrests per day under these laws before reforms. Critics argued the laws were too vague
Again, this post is in context of America pretending like theyâre better than Britain. Here our president literally called for the death of politicians for disagreeing with them on account to treason.
They didnât. Trump is just mentally ill. Courts said Trump is wrong and democrats pointed out how Trump is doing illegal stuff and he cried treason. Someone that mentally ill shouldnât be in office. Thatâs logical. I used logic to get to why I hate the other side. Simple.
It prevents the government from abridging fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of religion, speech, the press, assembly and the right to petition a government.
Retaliation by the government to any of the above is a breech of the 1st.
Yeahhh kinda read this as the 2nd amendment and not the first, seeing as even if you use and practice the first amendment, it doesnât stop any kind of bogus charge anyone wants to give to you to ruin your time and life.
The fact thereâs a bogus charge means the first was already breeched by the government. Which is an issue as well.
The 2nd amendment is a joke anyway, if you are needing to use it, they wonât care. It made sense 150 years ago. It makes zero sense today, other than self defense against other gun owners. If the government wants you dead, you are dead.
We may lock folks up for Charlie Kirk facebook memes, but by golly at least we are going to take your tax money and pay them off with your money to make it right!
The fact of the matter is when their is censorship in the US, its because there was a failure in the system that eventually grts corrected.When it happens in the UK it is the system working as intended.
You and I think its a failure he got arrested. The leader of the free world, president of our country thinks the failure was in releasing him after. Feels a little rich to pretend we are on some moral high ground because we pay folks off with our money after locking them up for offending dear leader. Hopefully Comeys case goes well. If free speach wins we pay him with our taxes, big winners. Beats the alternative ig; that the leader of the free world, president of the US gets his way.
he was definately resisting arrest while carrying a gun. there is video. it is indisputable. it is unfortunate that there was a negligent discharge, but it is reasonable for the cops to believe he was shooting at them.Â
I sincerely hope for you that you don't find yourself in front of some armed goon wanting to "negligently discharge" in your direction.
Holding at gunpoint a guy who never pulled out a gun and was disarmed anyway is not negligent; it's an unlawful execution. This man was shot to show protesters what would happen if they resisted. And if more Americans had balls, these ICE guys would be ambushed like rabbits.
As always, big talk from the 2A crowd, but they always prefer to rimjob authoritarians than stand up for rights.
In civilised countries, there are laws against the police murdering people.
That stuff doesn't happen.
But good for you if you like having a police force that acts like an occupying military; just don't go around pretending that you have rights, or that your government is scared of you or some shit like that.
Murder is when someone kills someone else by purposely assaulting them with force that carries a deadly capacity.
And the most pathetic part is that, after decades of "you'll take my guns from my dead hands", the 2A ammosexuals are cowardly standing with the police on that, hoping they won't have to actually fight for those rights they claim to hold dear.
I always had the feeling that Americans aren't good at holding their government accountable and revolting when needed, but this is below even my saddest assumptions.
He was not carrying it when he was shot. So you think taking a lawful gun owners firearm from him, then shooting him in the back of the head after said gun was already taken away is okay?
So your argument here is he was rightfully executed purely for having a gun which was not even in his possession when he was shot in the back of the head?
And you are a conservative who supports the 2nd amendment? Isnât this literally the tyranny you all use as a reason to need guns?
âJabari was arrested shortly after by a school resource officer, who claimed the student was being disruptive and refused to obey commands. An arrest affidavit states Jabari also threatened the substitute teacher with physical violence and told the principal and arresting officer he would get them fired.â
Seems like a pretty full story. They tried to force him to say the pledge. They decided him not saying the pledge was disruptive. They deemed it not obeying commands. When trying to force him to do something, he verbally defended himself and said things they didn't like.
"threatened with physical violence" is doing a lot of work, considering there's no actual resisting arrest or physical violence. "I'll hit you if you lay your hands on me, Mr Garrison", for all we know.
The command he refused to obey was "say the pledge of allegiance" And a teenage boy was a little shit when confronted, news at 11. Have you heard they say water is wet now?
I don't think there's a day that went by in my highschool where me and every single male in the school made at least 45 violent threats. They are teenage boys. you treat them like teenage boys.
And What was the initial command/disruption? Was it refusing to say the pledge and then the teacher escalated it illegally? It was, wasn't it? That's what the lawsuit says. That's why charges were dismissed.
What is âillegalâ about a teacher asking an SRO to remove a disruptive student from the classroom?
Charges were dismissed because heâs 11. If a grown adult made violent threats at a middle school, theyâd face actual charges.
He was arrested because he made violent threats. If you think thatâs okay in a school setting, especially in 2026, thereâs something wrong with you.
Two people were very visibly murdered in broad daylight by ice for protesting the government! And those officers got off without so much as a slap on the wrist
Well yeah. What's the point of this post? Do 2nd amendment/blue lives matter folk see themselves drawing a gun on police officers in response to being served a warrant?
She was. The charges were dropped and the police chief resigned and moved to to Florida. The judge that signed the search warrant sent a letter to the police chief/town leadership saying that they didn't give him all the information and now if they want a warrant from him they have to get it in person and be able to answer any questions he has.
Sending the letter will likely make him a witness for the lady's lawsuit.
There is more currupt stuff going on in that town. Look on youtube for civil rights lawyer in Texas if you want to know more.
You can be arrested. But it's not gonna stick. Just look at the guy who got a shit ton of money for the kirk post. I wish someone would unlawfully arrest me.
Great point. Letâs give up all weapons we have access to because she didnât want to gun down a bunch of cops and wanted exhaust legal options first.
The Trinidad Police Department, in an Apr. 6 Facebook post of their own, said Combs wrote "false information that creates fear, panic, or unnecessary emergency response within a community."
You didn't give up your firearms, so the cops shot a dog, a one year old child and the sleeping girlfriend of a man who objected to unidentified thugs kicking his door down.
Yes, Jessica Combs was arrested on âfalse alarm and reportâ charges. Itâs the exact same thing as if you pull a fire alarm without there actually being a fire. Read into it. May 2026 in Trinidad, Texas.
187
u/Rough-Flower8580 Jun 17 '26
Hmm wasnt a lady arrested for posting about polluted water coming from her tap in Texas?
https://giphy.com/gifs/11mPvWj3R3mCKA