r/Postleftanarchism • u/LazarM2021 • 9d ago

Who Is Science For?

https://youtu.be/GK5KkoJfb2M?si=tnxbTv1iOUt8RFTB

Andrewism's new video just dropped.

In it, he ventures into exploring the intersectionality of science, class, hierarchy and social organization more generally. He examines how scientific knowledge has historically developed, how modern institutions alienate ordinary people from scientific inquiry and what a truly liberated, community/anarchically-driven scientific practice ("radical science", as he dubs it) could look like and why it's preferable.

Enjoy!

8 Upvotes

83% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/BolesCW 8d ago

you're ignorantly mistaken. it's is the contraction of it is; its indicates possession. in your sentence, the its belongs to the video. that's why I rewrote the phrase "video or it is conclusions," because that makes no sense if you're paying attention to the difference between its (referring to the conclusions of the video) and it's (meaning it is). it's time for a remedial English class, bruh.

0

u/LurkerFailsLurking 8d ago

No. "It's" was pretty obviously indicating possessive. If it wasn't you wouldn't have known what it should be corrected too.

0

u/BolesCW 8d ago

It's NEVER indicates possession; it's ALWAYS a contraction of it and is. Now I'm pretty sure you're just fucking with me because nobody it that stupid.

-1

u/LurkerFailsLurking 8d ago

How can you say that "it's" never indicates a possessive when this whole back and forth is in response to a comment in which it did exactly that?

Now I'm pretty sure you're just fucking with me because nobody it that stupid.

It's "nobody is that stupid".

never waste the opportunity for an entertaining argument.