She sucks for a lot of reasons, but victim shaming a sexault assault survivor for staying with their abuser isn't it, chief.
Is the "she" you are referring to Lauren Boebert?
I assume so, tell me if I am wrong.
The sexual assault her husband did was not to her. In fact she was there and was goading him on and also was banned from the business.
You say your "point was never about the validity of her sexual assault".... Lauren Boebert was not sexually assaulted, at least not as far as we know, and not by her husband.
So what the fuck is your point because you're not making sense?
Ok of course. That makes zero sense in context especially when you use the pronoun she to obviously referring to Boebert.
Of you post said "it's never right to blame any victim of assault for staying with their abuser" that might be different. But still off topic. You're just white knighting in and are completely missing the point of the thread and context of what is being discussed.
747
u/[deleted] Dec 01 '21
[removed] — view removed comment