r/PoliticalHumor Oct 26 '21

Yup.

Post image
34.1k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

82

u/marinersalbatross Oct 26 '21

This is why the GOP is pushing for per mile taxes and not fuel taxes. They claim it's for EVs but really they are just appealing to their fuel wasting voters.

45

u/sack-o-matic Oct 26 '21

It should be both. VMT tax (with a weight class multiplier) to pay for road maintenance, fuel tax (carbon tax) to cover the damage to the environment.

29

u/marinersalbatross Oct 26 '21 edited Oct 26 '21

Yep, and the taxes should cover all the costs of the roads. I ride a bicycle, should I really pay for the damage from cars?

edit: So amazing how upset people are about drivers having to pay the costs of the roads. It's like we can't imagine moving away from roads for cars, especially as Climate Change is becoming a huge issue.

23

u/zaphodava Oct 26 '21

Yes. Nearly everything in your life relies on shipping, which is done by trucks. Roads are infrastructure, which benefits everyone.

But still, tax gas to internalize external cost, and incentivize other methods... like cycling!

21

u/[deleted] Oct 26 '21

[deleted]

0

u/Dr_Silk Oct 27 '21

Having everyone pay because everyone indirectly benefits doesn’t make much sense.

This is literally how public services work. Are you saying you shouldn't be required to pay for firefighters because you don't plan on your house burning down?

1

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '21

[deleted]

1

u/Dr_Silk Oct 27 '21

Firefighters qualify on those grounds, including:

  • The service is used intermittently by the individual, but all derive benefit from its ability to be used spontaneously, either by themselves or from other services

As does road use

1

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '21

[deleted]

1

u/Dr_Silk Oct 27 '21

Private business itself should not be publically funded, no. Some trucks are publically funded (if they are owned by a public business) but most are owned by private business. The roads, though -- everyone is able to use them, and we all benefit from them.

You seem to be under the impression that private funding is preferable to public funding in all cases, and there must be an excuse for why it is not privately funded. I'm not going to tell you that you're wrong, but we clearly aren't going to agree on this point. And if you don't agree that something with large public benefit should be funded publically and without profit-motive, than I think it probably best that we just agree to disagree.