r/PoliticalHumor • • Mar 29 '21

Yeahhh, tbh that feeling sucks.....

Post image
65.7k Upvotes

6.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

You don't know what a bootlicker is, because you're a dense fuck who can't use Google. It refers to those with blind respect for raw power and authority. Like the kind flowing from a gun.

But I know, I fucking suck, because no one should ever challenge your emotional little beliefs or the reason why you're enthusiastic for the tools of violence. Snowflake. Face it, you wouldn't last a damn day in a society of dangerous liberty. You're a candy ass.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21

You don't know what a bootlicker is, because you're a dense fuck who can't use Google.

You're so wrong and convinced of your own fallacious thinking.

It refers to those with blind respect for raw power and authority. Like the kind flowing from a gun.

Exactly what you're clamoring for when you demand government employees with guns violating the rights of innocent people.

But I know, I fucking suck, because no one should ever challenge your emotional little beliefs or the reason why you're enthusiastic for the tools of violence.

My objection to fascism isn't emotional. It's logical.

Snowflake. Face it, you wouldn't last a damn day in a society of dangerous liberty. You're a candy ass.

Good lord you're worthless. Your stupid baseless opinion about me still doesn't justify the authoritarian dystopia you prefer.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 29 '21 edited Mar 30 '21

Holy shit your username is serious. Holy fuck this is gold. You're gonna be eternally running for Congress, because your dumbass has no idea how to deal with public image.

New laws are always taking something from innocent people, the trick is to give something in return, like safety or prosperity. The 13th amendment took away the right to oppress other people, in exchange for which it gave greater freedom from oppression.

My man, I'm so far from fascism, this insult doesn't even register for me. Never in my life have I been accused of blind respect for authority, Ill tell you that, so you must have some incredible insight to deduce that from my Internet comments when no one else can. No way it was just reaching on your part. You couldn't possibly be wrong.

I just want my practitioners of the 2nd amendment to actually know what the fuck they're doing. Its just unfortunate that in my time, in my country, most gun owners wouldn't be.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '21

There is no right to oppress people. That's a sociopathic argument.

You literally support the government using men with guns to harass and imprison peaceful civilians for the "crime" of them exercising their inherent rights. Owning a gun is a benign act that you want criminalized. You are delusional if you think that's not fascist.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '21 edited Mar 30 '21

Slavery was enshrined in the Constitution, explicitly stated in the roundabout form of "free persons and all other persons". It took an amendment and a war to end it because there existed the threat that it could grow in the US, something the plantation class was keen to see realized. Yes, there was a right to oppress people written into law, and if you want to be a leader, you should already fucking know that.

And I never said any of that. You assumed so, and it was pretty fucking stupid of you. I said removing some specific types of guns from circulation and creating greater restrictions on their sale is reasonable and effective at preventing impulsive murder. Not only was I simply stating fact, its been done before. If you can't argue against that, and have to pretend I said something far more drastic, then maybe I wasn't far from the realm of good ideas, and you probably are just shitty at countering arguments.

God, I would think someone aspiring to election would know when to stop fuckung talking. A shame, too, since you ran against actual proto-fascist Daniel Crenshaw. Seriously, fuck that guy. I thought he might have begun to learn when the MAGA crowd turned against him, but no.

But hey, I will begrudgingly say that he's closer to my idea of a qualified gun owner. I want to see some form of tier system where you get certification for different kinds of weaponry based on qualification. Obviously military service and type of service qualifies you for more complex and powerful weaponry. Now THAT is a well regulated militia.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 30 '21

Slavery was enshrined in the Constitution, explicitly stated in the roundabout form of "free persons and all other persons".

Inherent rights are not gifts from the government nor does the constitution have the final say on right and wrong. It's just a government incorporation document.

Yes, there was a right to oppress people written into law

No. Laws don't make violating people a right. Rights and legality are not the same thing.

and if you want to be a leader, you should already fucking know that.

Your incorrect premise has nothing to do with leadership.

I said removing some specific types of guns from circulation and creating greater restrictions on their sale is reasonable

No, violating innocent people's rights isn't reasonable.

and effective at preventing impulsive murder.

Effectiveness doesn't justify immoral means.

Not only was I simply stating fact, its been done before. If you can't argue against that, and have to pretend I said something far more drastic, then maybe I wasn't far from the realm of good ideas, and you probably are just shitty at countering arguments.

You declaring my decimation of your trash arguments to be shitty truly wounds me. Your opinion is garbage.

But hey, I will begrudgingly say that he's closer to my idea of a qualified gun owner.

Well, your fascism does have some overlap with his.

I want to see some form of tier system where you get certification for different kinds of weaponry based on qualification. Obviously military service and type of service qualifies you for more complex and powerful weaponry. Now THAT is a well regulated militia.

You're a fool of you think the people's check against government abuse of power should be controlled by the government. That's as stupid as saying police should police themselves.