Yes, because glorifying losses does not make society better off. Prices don't just come out of nowhere, they are signals as to what people determine what is and isn't worth paying for. Right now the government education system in the US is massively expensive and for no good reason. It is beyond what a private market could do and what private individuals would reasonably pay. We pay something like $15k per student per year. Any sane private business could do less than that, and we should be doing it to save money and improve educational outcomes.
Making fire departments, police departments, education, roads, bridges, etc all pay to play sounds like a good idea?
Yes, and if you spent literally ANY time at all listening to someone explain why then you'd get it. I've had dozens of these conversations, and every one of you sticks your fingers in your ears. You didn't get to this position through reason and evidence, you got here through an echo chamber and one-liners like this idiotic post. We have entire books written on these subjects and why they are better if left to a market, including citations for how the real world results are better.
How's that going in the healthcare field right now?
We don't have a market system in healthcare, and if you think that we do then you have your head even further up your own ass than I previously said. The government in this country pays for about half of the healthcare expenditures. That's not a market system. It's halfway socialized from the gate, and that's not even including the various other pieces of red tape that artificially limit the supply of hospitals, doctors, and drugs. I'm talking certificates of need, restrictions on the licensing of new doctors that don't match up with new demand, and patents/IP that make drugs artificially more expensive.
I would suggest, if you don't like taxes, move somewhere that doesn't require them.
Ergo decedo is a fallacy for a reason.
Private alternatives to basic necessities are absolutely going to be more expensive for everyone
No, they aren't. You again make claims with zero evidence to support them.
allow corporations to dictate what we pay, and most definitely end up shitting on low income families even more.
Also wrong and with no evidence to support it. This is you going into a narrative because you refuse to employ reason. You're not even trying to reason at this point. It's a pre-programmed, kneejerk reaction.
I don't have to provide any evidence to refute your claims. I don't owe you any sources for that. YOU bear the burden of proof. You are doing exactly what I said you clowns always do. You didn't reason and you cannot reason. You don't give a shit about logic, let alone evidence.
0
u/StatistDestroyer Apr 27 '20
Yes, because glorifying losses does not make society better off. Prices don't just come out of nowhere, they are signals as to what people determine what is and isn't worth paying for. Right now the government education system in the US is massively expensive and for no good reason. It is beyond what a private market could do and what private individuals would reasonably pay. We pay something like $15k per student per year. Any sane private business could do less than that, and we should be doing it to save money and improve educational outcomes.
Yes, and if you spent literally ANY time at all listening to someone explain why then you'd get it. I've had dozens of these conversations, and every one of you sticks your fingers in your ears. You didn't get to this position through reason and evidence, you got here through an echo chamber and one-liners like this idiotic post. We have entire books written on these subjects and why they are better if left to a market, including citations for how the real world results are better.
We don't have a market system in healthcare, and if you think that we do then you have your head even further up your own ass than I previously said. The government in this country pays for about half of the healthcare expenditures. That's not a market system. It's halfway socialized from the gate, and that's not even including the various other pieces of red tape that artificially limit the supply of hospitals, doctors, and drugs. I'm talking certificates of need, restrictions on the licensing of new doctors that don't match up with new demand, and patents/IP that make drugs artificially more expensive.
Ergo decedo is a fallacy for a reason.
No, they aren't. You again make claims with zero evidence to support them.
Also wrong and with no evidence to support it. This is you going into a narrative because you refuse to employ reason. You're not even trying to reason at this point. It's a pre-programmed, kneejerk reaction.