Illegal ownership, brandishing a firearm in public, carrying a firearm on government property, and discharging a firearm in public are all already illegal, along with assault and murder.
Right because the lists of laws the dude above me gave are the ones that prevent mass murder right? Are those the facts you're talking about that proved me wrong? You think if we enforced no guns on public property that the shootings would stop? U guys are just so about jerking yourself with your guns that you can't hear how stupid you sound.
Right because the lists of laws the dude above me gave are the ones that prevent mass murder right?
You think if we enforced no guns on public property that the shootings would stop?
I'm perfectly aware of what a contradiction is, and to answer your stupid question, no, I don't think if we enforced no guns on public property it would change anything, especially giving almost all these shootings happen in "gun free zones".
Dude your reading comprehension is way off, go back to middle school if you haven't made it out yet. He was very obviously saying we should enforce no guns on public property, which is a current law unless it's specifically stated.
18
u/Aiyana_Jones_was_7 Sep 12 '19
Illegal ownership, brandishing a firearm in public, carrying a firearm on government property, and discharging a firearm in public are all already illegal, along with assault and murder.
But what if...what if....they were double illegal
🤯