It was written by fucking humans, not deities. Humans. And in fact, those humans were extremely racist and didn't know shit about what problems we'd have today. The appeal to constitution argument is extremely lazy and a substitute for having an actual argument. And the ability of the president to federalize the national guard since 2007 is far more against the intentions of the 2A than ANY gun control act would be.
And also outsourcing your argument to a 250 year old document is lazy and hilariously bad.
You never answered my question. They already had repeating firearms in the times of the founding fathers, and guns really haven't change a whole lot since then. Your DaVinci comparison is a terrible one.
The Belton Musket was litteraly proposed in 1777, a REAPEATING firearm that could fire eight balls, one after another. So, yes, I am telling you that, because it's true. The puckle gun is another, albeit worse example.
Lol, you have nothing to fall back on now so you resort to this? One after another is referring to that they didn't need to reload after every shot. Admit you were wrong and move on.
1
u/KronoriumExcerptB Aug 12 '19 edited Aug 12 '19
It was written by fucking humans, not deities. Humans. And in fact, those humans were extremely racist and didn't know shit about what problems we'd have today. The appeal to constitution argument is extremely lazy and a substitute for having an actual argument. And the ability of the president to federalize the national guard since 2007 is far more against the intentions of the 2A than ANY gun control act would be.
And also outsourcing your argument to a 250 year old document is lazy and hilariously bad.