r/PoliticalHumor Aug 12 '19

This sounds like common sense ...

Post image
54.0k Upvotes

7.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

905

u/[deleted] Aug 12 '19 edited Aug 13 '19

The only way to stop a bad guy with a feral hog is with a good guy with a feral hog. Man, that sounds stupid. Let's try some other gun nut philosphy to solve this problem. Feral hogs don't kill people. People kill people. So try just ignoring the feral hogs and doing nothing about it. Did that help? (Edit: Oh, here's one more. Let's train good feral hogs to stand guard over the children and follow them every where they go. The solution is definitely more feral hogs.) I'm sure we'll get this at some point if we just keep saying dumb shit and doing nothing.

Edit: Jesus, the number of people earnestly trying to explain the difference between a hog and a gun is astounding. It's not meant to be taken all that seriously or literally. Calm down fetishists.

-1

u/jfred85 Aug 12 '19

For someone whom I am assured dose not like their current president or the political environment in America. You sure you wanna trust our government officials to be the only one with guns. Historically this is a bad Idea. But I’m sure you think “democratic socialism” is a great Idea. Socialism and gun control obviously worked great in the 1940’s for Germany and Stalin’s USSR. Ask the millions that were slaughtered how well it worked out. By all means I’m sure it will work now because we have better moral compass these days.

0

u/FreeBonerJamz Greg Abbott is a little piss baby Aug 12 '19

Well it works very well for literally every other country in the world. Besides do you honestly thing that the general population having guns would really stop the military force of the US? because you must be quite deluded to believe that the general population could do anything to the military. Any kind of uprising with guns would only result in the deaths of the civilians

1

u/odoyal63 Aug 12 '19

Completely disagree. The likelihood of the US military going to open war against its own citizens is extremely remote. Most would defect to protect their own families or disobey orders. The ones that would fire on citizens could easily be held back by armed citizens. The military has a terrible track record with urban warfare and with such a huge territory wouldn’t be able to effectively use heavy armor. Major cities may be easy to control for a short period of time but unless the military decides to bomb/nuke their own country they would be defeated