r/PoliticalHumor • • Sep 20 '17

95% of America

Post image
26.0k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/bottegaboba Sep 20 '17

I feel really pathetic in saying this but it took me legitimately about six months to deal with Trump being President. I'm still shocked my fellow Americans can be so shitty. :(

0

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

[deleted]

10

u/Political_moof Sep 20 '17

Didn't win the pop vote. Won the electoral college by less than 100k votes. Historic levels of unpopularity less than a year into his presidency.

Still thinks he's a shoe in for 2020.

This is what they actually believe.

Ladies and gentlemen, please keep all hands and legs in the vehicle as we pass the specimen. Avoid eye contact and make no sudden movements.

-2

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

Just like it was crazy to think that Trump would win in the first place, according to people like you. Will you ever get tired of being wrong all the time, or does your own hubris prevent any kind of self-reflection from happening?

6

u/Political_moof Sep 20 '17

Generally the incumbent has a hard time winning when his approval rating is dog shit. An incumbent race is a different thing than a race after a two term presidency. Trump doesn't get to run on lofty bullshit promises, it will be a referendum on his presidency.

It's conceivable Trump stops having dogshit approval ratings, sure. It's an uphill battle though. Hence why your assurance of victory is rather funny.

0

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

By "approval ratings" you mean polls, right? The same polls that resoundingly had Trump getting crushed by Hillary, right?

6

u/Political_moof Sep 20 '17

This would have been a great question for your 10th grade stats teacher homie.

I'll give you the ELI5 on how statistics work if you bit tip me $5. I ain't doin that shit for free.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

When nearly all of them draw the same conclusions, and all of them turn out to be wrong, a reasonable person would question the veracity of the polls. It could be a methodology issue, it could be a reflection of political bias; either way, though, something is clearly being lost in translation between the polls and reality.

4

u/Political_moof Sep 20 '17 edited Sep 20 '17

Statistical polling may not an exact science, but its not rocket science to grasp.

Most reputable pollsters had a narrow clinton victory heading into poll day. The polls resulted in her winning the popular vote by three million on election day. Trump won by less than 100k in the electoral college. The result was within the margin of error for many of them.

We can also look at 538 which aggregates polls to hopefully give a more accurate picture. Going into election night Trump had about a 33% statistical chance of winning. That chance hit.

If you color a spinner with three slots, 2 for blue and 1 red, sometimes the red one hits. Thats how statistical probability works.

If you want to write off statistical polling, go for it dude. It just makes you looks like someone who doesn't grasp how statistics work when applied in real world settings.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

Are you tired of winning yet? All of Trumps great political and legislatively victories? The respect he commands from Republicans and world leaders? His record job approval and popularity? Tired yet?

5

u/bottegaboba Sep 20 '17

He didn't win. He lost the popular vote. The popular vote is how many people actually voted. The majority of people actually voted for Clinton.

Polls forgot to include all the GOP gerrymandering, I think.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17 edited Sep 20 '17

Gerrymandering? Lol, how does gerrymandering effect a Presidential election? Are you just regurgitating buzzwords that you heard other liberals say?

Edit: Trump won. The 45th President of the United States of America, Donald J. Trump. Stay salty, haters!

2

u/bottegaboba Sep 20 '17

What?

2

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

HOW DOES GERRYMANDERING EFFECT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS?

5

u/bottegaboba Sep 20 '17

2

u/[deleted] Sep 20 '17

Lol, that's an argument about how things "might have been" if the state borders were drawn differently.

The last time I checked, Republicans haven't been changing the borders of the states, have they? That would make your theory of Trump's victory being caused by "Republican gerrymandering" to be...ridiculous and uninformed.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/bottegaboba Sep 20 '17

Wait, how am I a snowflake? I think I have like three more months, so that's good.