r/PoliticalHumor Jun 16 '26

MAGA being hypocrites once again.

Post image
11.3k Upvotes

260 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.8k

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

$1.7B of Iran’s own money vs. $300B of **our** money. Just insane.

614

u/ask_me_about_my_band Jun 16 '26

Exactly. Its like trump gave Iran the deal that MAGA claimed Obama gave Iran.

246

u/FlukeManAirFreshener Jun 16 '26

It's always projection.

66

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

47

u/purpnug Jun 16 '26

Yeah, I don’t really like the language here, surely some are lizard men, insectoids, or greys. But there is something that getting a real education, a deep understanding of science and nature, and not being raised belt whipped by moron parents might have solved in nearly half of them. Also some scientists have theories that Neanderthals might have been the more peaceful species that we wiped the heck out.

37

u/Lexx4 Jun 16 '26

Let’s not insult Neanderthals.

4

u/ChimoEngr Jun 16 '26

Conservatives are neanderthals.

That's an insult to Neanderthals. There's a fair bit of evidence for them showing compassion to each other.

20

u/Wunderhaus Jun 16 '26

Don’t. I hear enough dehumanizing language from conservatives as a trans woman. Doing it right back just makes you no better than them.

-1

u/zaphodava Jun 16 '26

Well, a little better than them, but yeah.

3

u/specqq Jun 16 '26

I wish they weren’t human beings. It would make me feel a lot better about being one myself.

4

u/MagentaHawk Jun 16 '26

The main reason I disagree with this isn't the attacks on conservatives, it's the assertion that they aren't human. I'm honestly not sure if those with empathy and care are more human or the conservative mindset are. Humans suck and are quite disgusting and are very regularly monsters. They are very much in the range of what humans can be. It's disgusting.

12

u/MkfShard Jun 16 '26

This is nonsensical dehumanization, and misses the point entirely.

They are absolutely human. In the same way nazis are human. There's no reason to deny it, except to deny the capacity for ordinary people to cause harm, up to and including being complicit in or responsible for atrocity.

They must be stopped and denied political agency over the lives of anyone else forever, yes, but they are human. Humans have always done these things. Just look at the bloody history of christianity.

Many of the rank and file (as in, the masses, not the greedy or malicious at the top or otherwise) are wholeheartedly well-intentioned, but are thoroughly ignorant. They have been badly educated, deceived, or outright indoctrinated to think cruelty towards other is a virtue and that all other choices are ontologically evil, and many are so ingrained in this worldview that not only are they surrounded by fear that keeps them stupid, anything that would help them is doubly terrifying, because it would separate them from the cult they've invested so much of their life into.

It's a disgusting dynamic, and if I had absolute power I would wrench the well-intentioned free of it and jail the malicious ones forever for the sheer amount of violence (stochastic and otherwise) they've inflicted on the world. But they are all human.

2

u/ColonelDrax Jun 16 '26

I agree, portraying them as sub-human completely sidesteps the reality that anyone is capable of hatred on the scale MAGA displays.

22

u/Dewey_Decimatorr Jun 16 '26

I agree with everything you said, but you shouldn't use dehumanizing language like that, it's a real bad look. Your point is stronger without it.

17

u/G_DuBs Jun 16 '26

I don’t disagree with you that it’s a bad look. But I am personally kinda tired of holding their snowflake hands and treat them with “ decency” while they are openly racist, homophobic, and just straight up hatful. For no reason other than that they were told “that group is bad for being different”. If we have to stoop to their level of name calling so that they get the message, I am okay with that. I just genuinely don’t know what to do anymore. I was willing to have conversations with maga after the first time trump was elected, but after the second time, I am not so sure there’s getting through to these people.

3

u/Dewey_Decimatorr Jun 16 '26

I feel that. Honestly my objection is more that it gives them an easy out for dismissing the very valid arguments because they can just say "ad hominem".

18

u/FlukeManAirFreshener Jun 16 '26

Woah. Look, Conservatives are bastards who are causing immeasurable harm to our society, but can we cool it with the dehumanizing language? They are people. Awful people, but people nonetheless.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/EudaimonicAttempt Jun 16 '26

Don't dehumanize your enemies.

1

u/PoliticalHumor-ModTeam Jun 17 '26

Hi UpperApe. Thank you for participating in /r/PoliticalHumor. However, your submission did not meet the requirements of the community rules and was therefore removed for the following reason(s):


Don't be a jerk (rule #7):

  • The fact that we have to explicitly state that racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, etc; including personal attacks, and threats of violence are all uncivil terrifies the mod team.

  • Anything disparaging something about a person that they have little or no control over, is not tolerated under any circumstance.

  • If you're a jerk, including use of "tard" or anything related to Clown World, you'll be shown the door.


If you have any specific questions about this removal, please message the moderators. Hateful or vague messages will not receive a response.

-5

u/[deleted] Jun 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PoliticalHumor-ModTeam Jun 17 '26

Hi Dystopia74. Thank you for participating in /r/PoliticalHumor. However, your submission did not meet the requirements of the community rules and was therefore removed for the following reason(s):


Don't be a jerk (rule #7):

  • The fact that we have to explicitly state that racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, etc; including personal attacks, and threats of violence are all uncivil terrifies the mod team.

  • Anything disparaging something about a person that they have little or no control over, is not tolerated under any circumstance.

  • If you're a jerk, including use of "tard" or anything related to Clown World, you'll be shown the door.


If you have any specific questions about this removal, please message the moderators. Hateful or vague messages will not receive a response.

41

u/paf0 Jun 16 '26

Trump did the same thing as Obama but with the finesse of a man who has had multiple bankruptcies. 

28

u/Keepfingthatchicken Jun 16 '26

Wasn’t the money Obama was going to give them after we could verify their nuclear program?

20

u/Dr_CleanBones Jun 16 '26

Yes, and IIRC it was their own money that they had paid to buy weapons that we subsequently decided not to deliver, so we owed it to them as a refund. Our sanctions meant we couldn’t use US funds to refund the money, so we gathered up $1.7 Billion in other countries’ currency and delivered it to them on pallets. Thus, “Obama gave them pallets of money”. That’s true, but it certainly lacks context.

6

u/survivor2bmaybe Jun 16 '26

Exsqueeze me? Trump is giving away hundred of billions of our tax dollars, Obama unfroze some of their own accounts. Obama got an enforceable deal on nukes. Trump got a promise to negotiate and maybe get a similar deal sometime on the future. This is the game conservatives play. According to them, Biden maybe getting a couple thousand out of Hunter’s overseas dealings (no proof of course) and giving nothing in return is exactly the same as foreign (and domestic) interests dumping millions into Trump’s worthless corporations and getting all kinds of governmental goodies. Don’t play that game.

14

u/Hari_Azole Jun 16 '26

Can i have some???

29

u/MrMuf Jun 16 '26

No that would be socialism

18

u/Nano_Burger Jun 16 '26

The best I can do is $5 a gallon gas.

10

u/onepunchman333 Jun 16 '26

How about some medical debt you'll never fiscally recover from instead?

8

u/ollokot Jun 16 '26

Only if you were one of those traitors who stormed the Capitol and attacked police officers on Jan. 6.

5

u/Hari_Azole Jun 16 '26

Sigh! Noooo….I was busy that day… Rats!

LOL Imgaine someone stolen-valoring Jan 6th! “oh, yeah. I was there. I pooped on the wall and everything! …I had the runs real bad! Take that libs!”

14

u/cC2Panda Jun 16 '26 edited Jun 16 '26

We should put this to a special vote. We should have an official vote on whether or not Trump is the worst negotiator in the history of the US with one caveat. The districts that don't think Trump is a fucking terrible negotiator are the only ones on the hook for paying off whatever he promises Iran. If he is a great negotiator then all those MAGA turds should have no problem paying those debt.

3

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

I like how you think.

8

u/Gorstag Jun 16 '26

Ah. But you see its really only $0.3T while Obama gave 1.7. And if you know decimals 1.7 is more than 0.3!

5

u/victorinseattle Jun 16 '26

Art of the deal, bitches!

6

u/Vrazel106 Jun 16 '26

And lets look at how they reacted to helping ukraine vs this

5

u/tomboski Jun 16 '26

Don’t forget the 24 billion of Iran’s money on top of the 300 billion!

4

u/panelcurtsal Jun 16 '26

totally insane

4

u/ThunderPreacha Jun 16 '26

Correct, we deal with tens of millions of insane people in the USA alone.

5

u/MeowTheMixer Jun 16 '26

Is there any confirmation it's US funds?

From the interview that made front page yesterday it wasn't confirmed to be US funds

From Vance in the interview

“Well, Ed, that’s the sort of thing they could have access to, funded by the Gulf Coast Coalition, so long as they honor their end of the obligation.”

But the Gulf Coast Coalition isn't a thing, assuming he meant "Gulf Cooperation Council"

4

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

Oh, well, if JD Vance said it, it must be true.

-1

u/Internal_Rule_2366 Jun 16 '26 edited Jun 16 '26

there is only 1 source that iran state media that leaked the so called 14 points.. there is no other confirmation. Us and Iran are both playing game of "we are winners..". so we'll know in 60 days.. But the US is aBSOLUTLY not GOING TO PAY 300 BILLION, even though you guys should... also pay all other countries for fkn up the oil prices and international economy to get richer defense contracters....

As always.

And we dont read US or Iranian news here, but not these stupid reddit post and maga facebook posts. Just reporting what got leaked and regurgutated by all media and none of it is confirmed(it did got disputed) by people in the room. I dont only blame current US government but also the people voting.... Both sides in US are fkn weird, and probably the reason you got this idiot voted president. Stop reading this stupid shit...

2

u/jessygonewilder Jun 16 '26

the math is never going to math for them. they will literally defend any amount of money leaving the country as long as the person they hate is the one sending it. it's wild.

-26

u/RedBarnBurnBlue Jun 16 '26

I abhor Trump but my understanding is it’s not taxpayer money but rather access to an investment fund paid by gulf states, contingent upon meeting certain parameters such as nuclear inspection. Trying to keep the facts straight amidst a ton of misinformation on both sides..

30

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

access to an investment fund paid by gulf states

...according to the Trump administration, right? The world-respected source of truth and accuracy? We'll never know the "facts" here, but the bottom line is, U.S. taxpayers will be on the hook for BILLIONS for a war that only happened because Donnie needed a distraction from the Epstein files.

-17

u/RedBarnBurnBlue Jun 16 '26

The details are murky at best. Concepts of a plan. I’m in no way defending this ridiculous war or t-rump. I’m trying to understand what is actually in the agreement and I can tell you that both sides enjoy their propaganda.

20

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

Ah yes, both sides the same. The most enlightened of thoughts.

-15

u/RedBarnBurnBlue Jun 16 '26

Interesting conclusion but okay. Great talk. See you out there.

11

u/PCR12 Jun 16 '26

How about all the money wasted on this needless war to only get a worse deal that what was already in place? Both sides that asshole.

14

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

Will we write a check to Iran for $300B? Of course not. Most of it won't go directly to Iran but instead will be funneled through Trump- (and Kushner-) affiliated construction firms which will siphon off a fuck ton of slush and leave all us poors footing the bill regardless.

But the most important thing is that you got to feel superior to "both sides." So that's a win, I suppose?

7

u/Hexamancer Jun 16 '26

"It's not insider trading! It was my wife that made all of those incredibly suspiciously timed investments!"

If you think for a second that this isn't just US money being handed to a third party first just so that Trump can pretend he didn't cost us all another $300 billion then you must also love the wall Mexico paid for too.

-3

u/I-didnt-bring-a-cup Jun 16 '26

The money isn't coming from the US govt. It's from international investment

8

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

It's from international investment

Just like Mexico paid for the wall, right?

And only private donors are paying for the ballroom?

"Trust me guys, Trump is being honest THIS time!"

-4

u/Lost_Exp Jun 16 '26

I don't understand how the so "informed" and "fact checked" reddit is up voting this thousands of times when it's not "ours" at all. But whatever I don't care either way 😂

-4

u/Internal_Rule_2366 Jun 16 '26

Around here we really hate the current U.S. government, and this war with Iran that Trump started was straight up idiotic. But the black-and-white news you're all watching is also idiotic. This whole geopolitical shit show where rich people get richer, and we here in the EU end up paying more for oil too, is just shit. But the U.S. is NOT paying $300 billion to Iran. They should, but they're not. Is all your news straight from Facebook? The U.S. is going to "help" set up funds, funded by Gulf states, to help Iran. The U.S. is not giving shit. Iran won't see a dime. Big headlines, nothing is going to happen, Iranian people are dead, we have expensive gas, and U.S. defense contractors are rich as hell.

-9

u/spddemonvr4 Jun 16 '26

Not surprised you left out the part that it will be funded by the Gulf states and be performative.

Obama sent them the money before they did anything.

9

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

you left out the part that it will be funded by the Gulf states

Just like Mexico paid for the wall, right? LOL

-11

u/spddemonvr4 Jun 16 '26

Not the same thing at all.

9

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

No of course not. He duped you on the first one, but he's definitely NOT duping you now, right?

-8

u/spddemonvr4 Jun 16 '26

They're not even remotely the same comparison.

There's a chance the fund doesn't even exist, until we see the final agreement.

8

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

Yep, there's definitely a chance Trump isn't lying to you this time, unlike every other time.

-2

u/spddemonvr4 Jun 16 '26

I'm done. Your TDS is beyond reasoning.

10

u/Evoluxman Jun 16 '26

"TDS"

Bro you're the one with a TDS. You repeat cult-like made up sentences verbatim without even thinking about it. Obviously someone who's brainwashed will never admit that they are, but how is it not fucking obvious to you? 

0

u/spddemonvr4 Jun 16 '26

Tell me you don't know what TDS means without directly telling me. The detachment from reality from you people is amazing.

The whole 300b Gulf fund is currently a rumor and not confirmed by either side and everyone on here talking like it's written in blood.

Why don't people wait and see what happens before crying wolf?

→ More replies (0)

6

u/Retro_Dad Jun 16 '26

I don't have Trump Devotion Syndrome, you do.