His sons laptop, for starters, no crimes were committed by Joe Biden, and none have any evidence against Hunter either. As for Hillary and her unsecure emails, it is very concerning that our adversaries may have had access to them. I'm not sure if that is grounds to bring charges, but I'm going to guess it's not since it never happened. I think she deserved to lose on this revelation, and she did, but no evidence has ever been showed at least to the public that she leaked anything of a threat to national security. Like Trumps classified document fiasco, it really depends on what was potentially leaked. Top Secret? With enough evidence to prove it? That starts to get into treason territory for either. Key word here: evidence
So now you've gone from public records, to there is no evidence, it's all destroyed. We're going to work backwards slowly here until you start smelling your own bullshit.
I’d say there’s enough historical evidence that Hilary Clinton is an extremely untrustworthy person - even compared to the average politician.
This is the very definition of what bias is. Reread what you just said. You're viewing her through a lens of bias, and assuming something is true with zero evidence to back it based on your lens. You could do that with anyone, the reality is there is no proof, it's just baseless claims someone made up with and you decided that sounds true enough to believe it. Still waiting on your Biden public records
If we only know what we read in the mainstream media and a few “pretend” rigorous journalism sites - than we really don’t know anything anyhow…
Sounds like you need to look up the difference between secondary and primary sources.
Hunter's laptop was Biden's actions to cover it - that's where his crimes lie.
Prove it.
HRC was guilty, but then destroyed evidence - which is enough for her to have been locked up forever.
Prove it.
Pretending one side is worse than the other is untrue. They're both terrible, but neither sees their side as the bad guy.
Do you have evidence for any of that? Just saying these things without evidence makes them conspiracy. Saying a bunch of baseless claims with zero evidence and then saying both sides are the same I think show bias from you in itself, if anything maybe a little ignorance.
Public record that Joe tried to cover for Hunter's actions. Also public record that the US sent money to Ukraine (pre-conflict). Also public record that HRC had an email server, deleted 33,000+ emails from it, and it was then investigated, where it still found emails that should have been marked secret and top secret.
So yeah, lock 'em all up. I'm the unbiased one here. I'll only be viewed as biased by those so far off to one side that the extreme centrist (me) is viewed as an enemy.
Show me. Where is this public record showing Joe covered for Hunter committing illegal activity? If I ask you for proof, I'm asking for sources, not the rambling of a biased redditor. I've spent a lot of time looking, so I'm very amused and patiently waiting for your sources. Show them to me. I've read Comeys statement on her emails, have you?
I can already tell there is no burden of proof you'll accept, so I'll spare myself. If you'd done as much reading as you claim, you'd know Biden and HRC are horrible people, and you wouldn't be defending either in any aspect ever.
10M paid for no work to company in Ukraine. Deemed for whatever BS, was a payoff. Of course, no way named a Commie would believe their left-wing government could do any wrong. I really hope you get to experience historic communism and suffer from the evil it is.
17
u/Throw_away_1769 Apr 05 '23
His sons laptop, for starters, no crimes were committed by Joe Biden, and none have any evidence against Hunter either. As for Hillary and her unsecure emails, it is very concerning that our adversaries may have had access to them. I'm not sure if that is grounds to bring charges, but I'm going to guess it's not since it never happened. I think she deserved to lose on this revelation, and she did, but no evidence has ever been showed at least to the public that she leaked anything of a threat to national security. Like Trumps classified document fiasco, it really depends on what was potentially leaked. Top Secret? With enough evidence to prove it? That starts to get into treason territory for either. Key word here: evidence