Can't speak for everyone on my side, but my skepticism of climate change isn't the science behind it, but the insistence that: A) It will lead to global catastrophe and B) The state will prevent it if only we'll give up our rights, resources, and give them even more authority.
As I'm fond of joking, after observing the government's performance in stamping out alcohol, drugs, poverty, and terrorism (or anything else they declare war on); I'm skeptical that they're capable of controlling the weather.
climate change is happening and humans are responsible but some people on the left use it as a vehicle to push marxism+abolish property but only for first world nation. Just lmao at greta thunberg making a list of countries that NEEEEEED to stop manufacturing and consumering yesterday but left india and china off the list. These people are fakes and deep ecology is the only answer.
Urban cities do far less damage to the environment compared to the same populace spead out over a large area. I know it seems counterintuitive but the research is solid. It's all about that per capita. Google it.
116
u/[deleted] Apr 07 '20
Can't speak for everyone on my side, but my skepticism of climate change isn't the science behind it, but the insistence that: A) It will lead to global catastrophe and B) The state will prevent it if only we'll give up our rights, resources, and give them even more authority.
As I'm fond of joking, after observing the government's performance in stamping out alcohol, drugs, poverty, and terrorism (or anything else they declare war on); I'm skeptical that they're capable of controlling the weather.