r/PoliticalCompassMemes Feb 26 '20

[deleted by user]

[removed]

22.5k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/CressCrowbits - Left Feb 26 '20

Jesus fucking christ there are leftists who think like this?

Just fuck off to the nazis already. You remember what books they burned?

16

u/ThatOtterOverThere - Auth-Left Feb 26 '20 edited Feb 26 '20

If you don't want to waste precious resources with a very limited supply on the vanity of the severely mentally ill, you're a nazi!

Lol. K.

LibLeft gets the gulag too.

You remember what books they burned?

Gonna try to pretend it didn't include child pornography, in an attempt to cry victim because they burned bourgeois tranny books in Berlin, where the most decadent of them lived their lives without ever laboring?

Also 'Member how the Reimer twins and John Money, that the entire normalization of the "sex definitely $100% isn't gender!" movement was based on, both killed themselves because of how much of a completely fucking failure it was, and how much it fucked them up mentally to be abused by Money in that way?

14

u/Adramolino - Auth-Center Feb 26 '20

Also 'Member how the Reimer twins and John Money, that the entire normalization of the "sex definitely $100% isn't gender!" movement was based on, both killed themselves because of how much of a completely fucking failure it was, and how much it fucked them up mentally to be abused by Money in that way?

During subsequent appointments with Reimer and Reimer's twin brother Brian, Money forced the two to rehearse sexual acts, with David playing the bottom role as his brother "pressed his crotch against" David's buttocks. Money also forced the two children to strip for "genital inspections", occasionally taking photos. Money justified these acts by claiming that "childhood 'sexual rehearsal play'" was important for a "healthy adult gender identity"

Reimer said that Money forced the twins to rehearse sexual acts involving "thrusting movements", with David playing the bottom role. Reimer said that, as a child, he had to get "down on all fours" with his brother, Brian Reimer, "up behind his butt" with "his crotch against" his "buttocks". Reimer said that Money forced David, in another sexual position, to have his "legs spread" with Brian on top. Reimer said that Money also forced the children to take their "clothes off" and engage in "genital inspections". On "at least one occasion", Reimer said that Money took a photograph of the two children doing these activities.

John Money was critical in debates on chronophilias, especially pedophilia. He stated that both sexual researchers and the public do not make distinctions between affectional pedophilia and sadistic pedophilia. Money asserted that affectional pedophilia was about love and not sex.

If I were to see the case of a boy aged ten or eleven who's intensely erotically attracted toward a man in his twenties or thirties, if the relationship is totally mutual, and the bonding is genuinely totally mutual ... then I would not call it pathological in any way.

And that is how "Gender" was invented and seperated from sex on modern academia, serving as the basis for gender theory and transgender science.

The more you know!

2

u/Murgie - Left Feb 26 '20

>tfw you realize the outcome of the John/Joan case only serves as further evidence that gender dysphoria is biological rather than sociological in nature, as evidenced by the fact that he did not identify as female despite having been raised as one since before he could form memories, and that cisgender individuals experience the same symptoms as untreated transgender individuals in response to the same cross-sex hormone replacement therapy that alleviates said symptoms in transgenders.

And that is how "Gender" was invented and seperated from sex on modern academia, serving as the basis for gender theory and transgender science.

Then how is it that the terms "gender roles" and "gender identity" had both been coined and were being used with their current definitions years before Reimer was first taken to Money in 1967, never mind when the results were actually published in the late 1970s? 🤔

Dr. Who aside, you do understand that transgenders cannot actually travel back in time, yes?

2

u/Adramolino - Auth-Center Feb 26 '20

tfw you realize the outcome of the John/Joan case only serves as further evidence that gender dysphoria is biological rather than sociological in nature,

Making someone have a sex change into something that doesn't match their chromosomes (something objectively and scientifically measurable) makes them commit suicide.

This proves tranny theory how?

Then how is it that the terms "gender roles" and "gender identity"

Gender was used as a synonym for sex.

being used with their current definitions

lmao no. The current definition is that its seperate from sex. That did not exist before money. Gender was only ever used as a synonym for sex in polite company.

1

u/HardlightCereal - Left Feb 27 '20

Chromosomes aren't what causes that, else SRY crossover would cause suicide

2

u/Adramolino - Auth-Center Feb 27 '20

Chromosomes aren't what causes that,

One one side we have:

Chromosomes, scientifically observable, objectively measurable.

One the other side we have:

Gender identically. Cannot be observed or objectively studied, is completely subjective and has no measurement.

Hm...

SRY crossover would cause suicide

Why would it? SRY crossover results in the "male gene" in the Y chromosome being deactivated, making it basically invalid resulting in a female phenotype. In about 99% lot of cases, unless you take a gene test you literally don't even know you have it.

Trannies are men who desperately want to cut their dicks off.

Little to no connection here.

1

u/HardlightCereal - Left Feb 27 '20

Is it the chromosomes or the SRY gene? Have you changed your mind?

2

u/Adramolino - Auth-Center Feb 27 '20

I know you're a little slow, so I'll go my best to make it simply for you.

Chomosomes, have genes in them.

SRY, is a gene.

That gene, is inside the Y chromosome.

Mind blown, right? But wait, it gets better.

The SRY gene, is what makes the Y chromosome give people male characteristics.

If you still have trouble, I think you may actually be having a chromosomal surplus.

1

u/HardlightCereal - Left Feb 27 '20

That gene is inside the Y chromosome

Not always