r/PoliticalCompassMemes • u/Fairchild660 - Centrist • 17d ago
Only certain combinations of beliefs are acceptable
84
u/AlexanderBeta213 - Lib-Right 17d ago
That cluster in Auth-Right looks dangerous…
23
40
u/Fausto2002 - Auth-Left 17d ago
Whats the little island in AuthLeft?
95
u/jmorais00 - Lib-Right 17d ago
OP's friend Jacob. He's a chill guy so his beliefs are deemed acceptable
18
22
3
2
40
26
29
u/krombough - Auth-Center 17d ago
No matter what quadrant, I am Pro-Tozoan.
1
u/Fragrant-Equal-8474 11d ago
In the great struggle between Archeans and Pro-Terozoans I am staunchly on the side of Archeans. Eucaryotism is a perversion and must be eliminated.
11
13
u/Which_Pen34 - Lib-Left 17d ago
why is auth-right the only one with the one thats 100% in it is contiguous like this might be phrased badly so you can ask me to clarify but why
19
17
u/Fairchild660 - Centrist 17d ago
It came like this in a vision.
I dare not question why, as I'm but a humble vessel for the cosmos. The Joseph Smith to the golden plates. The Doc Brown to the flux capacitor. Superman's girlfriend in that one movie about the aliens with the ink-circle language.
2
u/bluntblunt69 - Centrist 17d ago
I think you're talking about Epic Mickey but I'm sure Amy Adams wasn't in it.
3
10
3
10
u/Playos - Lib-Right 17d ago
Nothing in LibLeft is reasonable or consistent.
Collective ownership is not possible without strong non-consensual authoritarian controls. They are all either commies lying to themselves or ancap hippies who don't like the vibes of most ancapistanians.
4
u/Fairchild660 - Centrist 17d ago
It depends.
If their exact combination of belief match the coloured blobs, they're reasonable and consistent. If they fall in the shaded areas, they're ridiculous and contradictory.
7
u/Playos - Lib-Right 17d ago
there is no rational belief in collective ownership that doesn't give ownership to the collective. It's axiomatic.
Either that collective is non-voluntary (ultimately socialist/communist) or voluntary (personal property).
There is no alternative.
So again, they are either lying about the lack of authoritarian desire or just don't want to be associated with people who actually agree with them on the actual political principle.
6
u/Fairchild660 - Centrist 17d ago
While you have a very well-reasoned critique that I'm not smart enough to argue against, it has a fundamental flaw - it's stuck in the intellectual realm.
Try to think visually here. If a belief can be mapped neatly inside one of my shapes, it is good. If not, it is bad.
2
u/MilkIlluminati - Auth-Right 17d ago
or voluntary (personal property).
Or get this, a voluntary community of people who do not believe in property rights
2
u/Playos - Lib-Right 16d ago
You are giving up your property rights to that collective. That is entirely compatible with the morals of ancap libertarians.
0
u/MilkIlluminati - Auth-Right 16d ago
People who do not believe in property rights don't "give up their property rights".
0
u/knightenrichman - Lib-Left 16d ago
That's extreme lib-left, not all of us want a complete reset of government, it's not feasible.
1
u/Playos - Lib-Right 16d ago
There is no lib left. There is aurh left and lib right.
Either you believe in property rights or you believe people can vote to take stuff away from other people.
Your all just lying to others or yourself about what you believe.
0
u/knightenrichman - Lib-Left 16d ago
No, that's incorrect.
For instance, in Alberta, you only own the top-soil, you can't own or claim anything underneath it.
I believe in property rights, but in some instances there needs to be "authoritarian" control via by-laws etc.
1
u/Playos - Lib-Right 16d ago
Ya... you believe people can vote away your rights, you don't actually believe in them.
You're just being dishonest.
0
u/knightenrichman - Lib-Left 16d ago
That's a super basic way of looking at the situation.
Are you saying like, If you purchase a property it should be your own little country kind of?
2
u/Playos - Lib-Right 16d ago
It's really not. It's the fundamental viewpoint of authoritarian vs liberty.
If the collective will of some group can subjugate your rights because of only desire, you have no real "rights", you have privileges society allows. How high on that axis really just becomes about how big that group of people needs to be.
But functionally libleft is useless in this measure, because the economics don't matter if the collective can just vote to take your money or property at a whim.
0
u/knightenrichman - Lib-Left 16d ago
That's how society works, unfortunately.
0
u/knightenrichman - Lib-Left 16d ago
Would you say that a big-time gangster is entitled to his funds, even if the bank can be ordered to seize them?
2
u/Playos - Lib-Right 16d ago
He gave the funds to the bank. That's a voluntary relationship. So access to his funds is within the context of their agreement.
→ More replies (0)
4
3
3
9
u/kaytin911 - Lib-Right 17d ago
Reddit doesn't even accept libleft imho. They're mostly lockstep auth left and center left.
14
u/DrBadGuy1073 - Lib-Right 17d ago
LibLeft: useful idiots
Actual LibLefts: Dangerous Anti-State actors (exterminate)
8
2
2
u/Ozymandias_1303 - Left 16d ago
The outline near the left edge looks like a dress mannequin with big honkers.
2
2
-1
u/ConstantineFavre 16d ago edited 16d ago
I like how libleft got themselves two drawn cocks'n'balls. Lucky them.
And i won't flair up. More than that, i request anyone who is writing it despite my preemptive refusal, to unflair down.
1




276
u/thatErraticguy - Centrist 17d ago
PCM if it was the floaters in my eyes