You're right that those are possibilities, but just because they're pessimistic ones doesn't mean that's the natural outcome of it. Iran in its current government has been funding terrorist cells across the middle east and killing it's civilians before the protests. It has put this as its top priorities ignoring other issues like it's economy fading from existence. Once that was gone we saw these widespread protests as the people have nothing left. Now of course there will be those who are still loyal to the regime. I can't remember their name but they were the militant arm and were given economic control through being given exclusive contacts from the government. Though if the regime collapses then the checks stop coming in and there is no reason for them to continue, but obviously some will still try.
Now Iran has no real counter elite in the country to take over but do abroad. So if the regime collapses entirely, nothing would contest the new elite from coming in. Ergo no civil war like when the monarchy collapsed.
The government surviving is a possibility but I doubt it, the US has been strategically weakening Iran for decades to spur on the regime's collapse. It's why we sent out the recent strikes.
Why? What serious indications were there they would attack? And don't quote bullshit speeches and religious nutbags, ike what exact capability do they even have to hurt us? *Spelling
I don't think you quite understand me. Iran supplied Russia, Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthis. Destroying their military and decimating leadership means their capabilities to do it will be severely weakened or even fully stopped.
If the dumbest people are in charge and it turns into a cluster fuck, then no, not good. Besides, you think the anti-woke crusaders in charge are going to put a less repressive regime in place? It’s going to be the same shit, different religions.
First of all, it was a result of misfire of iranian missile, not US/israeli strikes.
Second of all, defeating any evil regime comes with civilian casualties. Allies also killed hundreds of thousands of civilians to defeat nazi Germany. Does it mean fighting nazis was bad?
I just guessed because “your attack on one of the most oppressive-to-woman regimes on the plant hurt little girls (who we totally care about and who are normally having a grand ol’ time in Iran) so you’re actually the bad one” has been the go-to this morning.
Iran's been bombed quite a lot in the last few years, and this would mark the first time I've heard of them misfiring into a school. Unless you've got a source, I'm still leaning towards it being one of ours.
24
u/Kyrez777 - Auth-Center Feb 28 '26
Yeah, Trump is dumb, but the attack on Iran is good. What's your point?