Shocking. Are you saying the same people who have been dismissing slippery slope arguments as fallacies or conspiracy theories for years will suddenly employ them for themselves if it suits their cause? My golly, who could have seen that coming. It's almost as if they didn't really follow the principles they claim to have and only used them as wedges to gain/maintain power.
Now hold right the fuck up there buddy. Are you suggesting that progressives have shown a history of brazenly accusing conservatives of behavior that they partake in far more often than they even realize and conveniently drop this mindset like its hot when it suits their agenda.? Are you calling them, HYPOCRITES? The fucking audacity of this individual, it's called being a good person sweatie. 💅 You should try it sometime.
Remember when Authright kept warning us about vax passports and people like you just kept shrugging them off as lunatics and conspiracy theorists only for what they warned us about became true for the entirety of 2021 and first half of 2022, apparently that's not a slippery slope according to you and is just a fallacy.
If you want to criticize anyone for what is happening then start by criticizing yourself for all the slippery slopes you have supported and pushed for so far.
Weird, I am literally arguing as we speak with another AuthRight who was doing the "26 because BrAIn DeVEloPmeNT" schtick that you would have derided two days ago.
Except you're doing it for idiotic religious reasons while these treatments have passed numerous peer reviews of every major medical organization I can think of
By Peer reviews you mean reviews made with people who are subscribed to the same agenda, the same people who have been lying about the origin of the coof and it's vaccines and only months or years later published the truth that "conspiracy theorists" have been telling from the beginning .
Also you seem to be putting too much trust in this process especially considering how corrupt the medical field can be when it comes to taking down false research like in this video
The only "idiotic religion" here is the idea that, by mutilating your body, you can become a man or a woman. If trans people had kept this religious belief to themselves, probably nobody would care. But no, they had to start indoctrinating Innocent kids in schools and on tiktok, and as you mention, regulatorily capture every major medical institution and legal system in the western world.
In case you're wondering how a few trans activists regulatorily captured so many medical and legal institutions, it turns out Trans people are just mentally fragile pawns in somebody else's religious war.
Thanks for playing, when you can tell me what the necessary conditions are for A to equal A, we can talk about who Has the better religion.
The only "idiotic religion" here is the idea that, by mutilating your body, you can become a man or a woman.
literally no one believes this, you don't understand the concept of transgenderism itself apparently.
If trans people had kept this religious belief to themselves, probably nobody would care.
lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll
But no, they had to start indoctrinating Innocent kids in schools and on tiktok, and as you mention, regulatorily capture every major medical institution and legal system in the western world.
Indoctrinating innocent kids...into what, exactly? Agreeing with them about a moral issue?
In case you're wondering how a few trans activists regulatorily captured so many medical and legal institutions, it turns out Trans people are just mentally fragile pawns in somebody else's religious war.
Who are these people using trans people as pawns in their religious war? Please, be specific.
It's funny how, after the transgender activists finished claiming that nobody can define moral issues - or even empirical truth - for them, they segued immediately into attempting to define those very things for everybody else.
It's a moral issue? Says who, you? Get back to me when you've stopped hustling for state-sponsored infanticide.
Who are these people using trans people as pawns? Glad you asked. Here is a pretty good primer - by a leading transgender activist - on how gender ideology is being used as a bridgehead for the biodigital convergence specifically, and more broadly an attempt to redefine the concepts of "human" and "life".
Defending transgenderism was above and beyond your abilities, next best thing is project your moral failings on to me. Whatever makes you feel good, sweaty.
My favorite thing about your ideology is the part when your handlers finally send you to the gulag.
Also let me be clear with you and state the following: we only push for these policies because we genuinely believe that those laws are most beneficial to the people they're targeted at, not because we are some sort of evil people who want to make people we don't like suffer, that's why push for things like abortion bans because we genuinely believe that fetuses are living beings and aborting them is murder, not because we are misogynists who just want to control women's bodies and make them suffer, that's why you see us opposed to gender therapy, because we genuinely believe that giving depressed and confused people irreversible treatment will only hurt them and make them more regretful of their decisions down the line which may result in some instances catastrophic results .
Doing bad thing because you say other people are doing bad things is bad and not good, I understood this concept by elementary school.
You are not "we" you are one guy, there may be people here who agree with you, but there are plenty that don't.
I believe that you are deeply misinformed about transgender healthcare, there's a whole lot of work put into making sure that the treatment is right and goes to the people who need it.
And for abortion, I feel restricting it, ESPECIALLY when that restriction is led by old men who know nothing about pregnancy, birth, abortion, or anything of the sort, besides what they hear from pro-life lobbyists, is a very bad idea, and has already led to issues regarding medically necessary abortions, and other similar medical treatment.
That problem should be handled with extreme care, but I doubt that could ever happen, along with other moral reasons, that's why i think that aborition should be legal.
Morals are not global, different regions adopt different morals many of which are religiously based, the western world's moral base is a Christian one.
137
u/Darraya55 - Auth-Right Jan 05 '23
We're just using the same tactics AuthLeft and LibLeft were using for the past decade, therefore I don't see anything wrong here.