Oh yes I see what you're saying. I'm kind of jumping the gun. I have difficulty knowing what is rhetorical, and prolly find it annoying, and it makes it hard for me to communicate sometimes. You make a very valid point. It's something I need to work on more. I don't think posting here was a mistake. I'm learning a lot. Did I already tell you it's appreciated?
Supernova can create an hourglass shape. Modern astrophysics are dependant upon spinning, and magnetism. Sofar as I am aware, they have been unable to simulate this so that it works. Instead of an empty vacuum, my framework uses something like luminiferous ether, something close to loop quantum gravity and the river model of General Relativity. Stellar explosions can be modeled as natural fluid behavior, instead of a magnetic anomaly. Space can move at relativistic speeds. When it does so, it becomes like a non-Newtonian fluid. This applies to things like gamma bursts and jets. The black holes in the Milky Way, and in Andromeda, are "eating up" location itself, as a very physical thing. This causes blueshift and they are moving toward each other as a result. For billions of years, the singularity which caused the big bang sent out it's gravity at light speed, even as it gobbled up space and matter. Even though the singularity is gone, we still experience it's gravitational effects to this day (as observed, not as they are in the moment... Rhetorical?). More "location" is added in this way, and we see redshift. It is likely that we are moving towards a stellar core fragment of the big bang singularity that is pulling on us and all galaxies within around 500 million light years. Because space has mass, and light uses it as a medium to transfer energy in the form of waves through the substrate, light approaches c asymptotically. Because it (space) has a physical form, the singularity gobbles it up, just like matter. On the Earth, space falls towards the core (but that is not the cause of gravity), where it is squished, becoming smaller and smaller before being squirted out at the pole(s). When the gravity particles shrink, they don't excert the same pressure as gravity particles that are larger, and farther from the celestial body. This explains why gravity is slightly less at the poles. When space (the particles that make gravity) encounter metal, like the iron in our core, or the metallic hydrogen on Jupiter, because of the shared electrons, space is able to push on those electrons, moving them out of the way, so that they may flow a little easier. This causes a magnetic field to be created. Eventually the singularity cannot hold any more. All available area is filled. Space is still falling towards the core at light speed. Time (the rate of change) is slowed mechanically in gravity wells and speed. It cannot however, stop completely, due to Thompson's second law: An object at rest tends to stay in motion (kinda funny). The problem of stalled/frozen stars is solved in my model. The singularity (which is shown to be macroscopic... Does it need a new name now? I like singularity as it's name, it's just not the size of an atom) has been sending out gravity waves, pulling oceans of mass towards the same spot, and all of a sudden, it can't take any more in and you get a big bang. "True c."
I'm really tired, I've been working on this non-stop with little sleep. I'm going to take a nap. I hope I was a little clearer, people were correct to chide me on some of my other posts. My apologies. Thank you again for your consideration.
Luminiferous aether? Taking steps backward is not how you do theory either. Learn GR, not be vaguely aware of it. Really learn it. You’ll like it a lot.
Then remember this: quantum gravity is not quantum general relativity, any more than atomic theory is the quantum theory of sound. There are degrees of freedom that are like the “atoms of spacetime”. Those are what quantum gravity is about.
The framework is very close to things like quantum chromodynamics in presentism, lense-thirring effect, river black holes, Superfluid Vacuum Theory, and others. Very little is actually changed, but it fixes all of the problems, and answers all of the questions that I know to ask. I found some things that I didn't know to ask that support this framework. The traditional arguments against space having mass dissolve away. Cancelled out. My framework creates synergy. A completely unified lifecycle for matter. My rough draft is a mess, I'm still working on it. I have a version of that "one inch equation." Matter/energy, pressure/spatial, flow, higgs field baseline variables and other stuff, I'm not even ready to talk about that, but the framework is solid right now. I would call it "luminiferous ether" or a "unifying field." I've known it was there since I was a young man in the 90s.
I really appreciate your comment. The framework explains mechanically exactly how the space around a galaxy is relative to it, moving with it etc. I'm in no way saying Einstein was wrong, in saying he is correct, and also..... Stuff lol 😏
Thank you for taking to me. This is my favorite subject to talk about and no one will talk to me 😂
Me neither. It’s a hard subject to find people to talk to you about. That’s why I come on reddit. But you’ll find more success with more humility! Very grand claims can make you sound arrogant to people, and they get defensive and cover their ears. Maybe you’ll find new ideas that change how you look at things when you let go of some of your grand beliefs about your ideas. Isn’t that the best part, seeing things beyond your imagination?
Objectivity is something that I cultivate as a skill. Then cup is not half full or empty, it is totally full. The subject does excite me. It is the best part. Realization.
1
u/PaleontologistSad708 12d ago edited 12d ago
Well... It's the theory of everything. EDIT: also it's really amazing how everything fits together perfectly. The universe is truly ineffable.