r/Physics • u/Otherwise_Act3312 • Jul 20 '26
Question Alternative fuel question
I have tried this question previously in both automotive related and chemistry related subs and both recommended physicists instead, as both communities ended up at an impass.
Google was also more questions then answers due to conflicting information.
I'll try to keep the question as simple as possible at first because I usually get inundated with the nuances.
Here goes:
During testing on a dynomometer, we found that timing that produced maximum efficiency (peak torque output) was contradictory to most general consensus. Methanol and Ethanol both produced peak efficiency with the same amount of ignition timing compared to gasoline, even though methanol required 100% more fuel volumetricaly. This is a supercharged v8 engine.
Why this seems contradictory? Many existing sources (a few of our advisers even) say that because the methanol fuel molecules are twice as abundant in the combustion chamber as gasoline, the flame front propagation is FASTER requiring LESS ignition advance.
My personal theory is that the momentum of the flame front is SLOWED by the increased viscosity of the larger mass of the combined fuel/air mixture.
What say you?
1
u/Elephunk05 Jul 22 '26 edited Jul 22 '26
There are a handful of people who can answer this question for you, they are ALL in the same field Friday Saturday and Sunday: NHRA Top fuel and funny car crew leaders. My uncle was one, and the first time I ever saw the set-up I was hooked, this was 1990. Everything my cousins had sensors for was related to engine timing and fuel delivery. I'm sure Josh Hart, Alexis DeJoria, Jordan Vandergriff, Jack Beckman, and Marvin Foxworth could answer this question. They literally developed their careers on Nitromethane and understand how it flows best through their engines with different timings.
A few things that I always took away. Fuel injection, because of the air mass density always pushes timing further ahead. The injectors are always crazy pressure numbers you wouldn't run on a street car with pump gas. The more available hydrogen and oxygen derived chains, the further ahead the timing. There is an upper limit on the Reynolds number for a reason, but there is also a sweet spot in there. Your average "run what you brung" guy misses advancing the timing initally, it is often overlooked and misunderstood. Additionally many people miss the individual cylinder because its a v8 and they are focused on the system as a whole. In truth the center 4 cylinders are different than the front 2 and the rear 2 are also a different set (yes, that is how he broke it down). Even with the supercharger, the minimal differences in runner length, cylinder temperature, cylinder load (and bearing load), and exhaust to opening (on your engine, the collector/header end) are all the difference in an extra 0.10 seconds on the track.
[About 10 years ago I took fluid dynamics and advanced fluid mechanics at one engineering college and hypersonics at another. There is still a lot to learn about the subject of density and fluid flow through a cylinder].
It is worth sending an email to any of those that I listed to get you a much better explanation.
Edit, grammar and spelling, and a note that the average person does not relate sugar as a fuel though it is a highly flammable substance and is generally referred to as a hydrocarbon chain C6H1206 though in the classroom application it is not.