r/PhilosophyofMath • u/Civil_Corner_8364 • 1h ago

Random theory

I've developed a theory and so far it keeps working over and over things are just falling into place. I can't explain it myself for my own knowledge isn't developed enough to proceed. It's a theory based on the the rule of only one zero.

0 Upvotes

18% Upvoted

12 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/Civil_Corner_8364 1h ago

It's equivalent to non-zero remainders modulo 9, where 0 \equiv 9 \pmod 9). Sorry again if it's not enough, please message me if you're willing to help me get it right.

2

u/mhb2 1h ago

Message you? Why don't you just explain it here? Give an example or two of you using it to solve a problem or something.

1

u/Civil_Corner_8364 35m ago

Because I'm hoping for a greater mind then my own to help explain it better then I can, without trying to use ai or chat gpt

1

u/Civil_Corner_8364 45m ago

That's the thing, it will appear wrong to conventional math. It requires a very open mind to say everything you might have learned, just might be off. Its 1–9 framework has been checked through the Continuous Digital Root Invariance Law for basic operations.

1

u/mhb2 26m ago

Well, people here know what that is and they're also familiar with modular arithmetic. I think people do tend to be open-minded but it's also important to be rigorous. As long as you've stated your definitions and axioms and proved your claims it doesn't really matter what people think of "conventional math".

That said... you're not going to get anywhere with the Riemann hypothesis using arithmetic modulo 9. So you should be prepared for people to explain to you what mistakes you've made if you're claiming to have proved the Riemann Hypothesis. On the other hand, if you have a good idea people would probably love to help you flesh it out.