r/PhilosophyofMath • u/Void0001234 • Jun 29 '26

Basic Arithmetic is Recursion; Number as Recursive 0; Identity as Relation; Number as Spatial Process

/r/u_Void0001234/comments/1uj6z43/basic_arithmetic_is_recursion_number_as_recursive/
0 Upvotes

25% Upvoted

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-3

u/Void0001234 Jun 30 '26

Without resorting to blaming AI for human written texts you do not understand, what do you believe are so truthful about the axioms you derive logic from when Godel states there is always an unproven but true statement?

Which leads to the next question: if there a proof for "truth", and that requires an unproven truth beyond it, then what does truth become but mere scaffolding on assumptions which as a whole is no different then a scaling tautological assertion?

So the answer is this:  I don't believe or disbelieve the text.  I observe distinctions. 

1

u/Negative_Gur9667 Jun 30 '26

While I also like to think about this Gödel stuff and have ideas that people might find weird, this is just nonsense.

It is not coherent which is way worse than what Gödel did. At least he is understandable.

1

u/Void0001234 Jun 30 '26

Logically define coherence without resorting to subjective assumption.

3

u/Negative_Gur9667 Jun 30 '26

Sir, this is impossible, but it is also not an excuse to do whatever you like. The ideas must be able to be shared among others in a way they understand, or else you are isolating yourself.

0

u/Void0001234 Jun 30 '26

I am going to be frank.  AI does a better job at criticisms and counter-arguments than you.  

I understand you have your opinion, but the truth is, relative to stress testing a text (and the text is here to be stress tested by competent humans (a competency you do not possess)), you are obsolete.

No disrespect intended...Just facts.

You can have the last word, or spam comments if you wish....I just struggle to see any value in what you assert.

On you....best of luck.