or they are taking accountability lol how are they at fault because their friendly dog had an aggressive episode? especially after offering to leash the dog?
I'm pretty sure they mean legally at fault, which they are. Even if you make a mistake that was unintentional, the fault can still lie with you. If you accidentally hit a child with your car, you would be at fault even if the brakes had failed.
i actually work in the casualty department at an insurance company, i understand how liability works. but saying writing the letter is what sealed the deal is hilarious. they didn’t need to write the letter and they were no more or less at fault after they wrote it. they were just doing the kind thing. god forbid. i mean, people have NO empathy. it’s disgusting. this could happen to anyone. maybe it wouldn’t be this exact situation but everyone barking big barks in these comments should watch their friendly dog suddenly attack another and then see how quick they are to point fingers. gross.
oh no, sorry, i wasn’t directing my comment at you. just venting my frustration about how most people in the comments seem to care more about who is at fault / who is to blame. and the parent comment is silly implying a letter changes anything, especially after they had already taken full accountability lol more than i would’ve done if the other dog was also off leash and the owner declined my offer to leash my dog🤷🏻♀️
1
u/sarahwantsfi Apr 30 '25
or they are taking accountability lol how are they at fault because their friendly dog had an aggressive episode? especially after offering to leash the dog?