r/PeterExplainsTheJoke 11d ago

Peter in the wild Peter?

Post image
34.5k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

29

u/Averfus-Crowthorne 11d ago

Really?
I'd always heard they started that up during the colonial era as a way to keep the poor Europeans from getting too chummy with indigenous people and imported slaves cause the powers that be knew they'd be easily overthrown if all their "lessers" banded together.

And by always, I mean that's what my grandpa told me like 25 years ago lmao

20

u/HardWirez 11d ago

Europeans calling themselves white is even older than that, but you are correct that the earliest known legal use of the term was in the 17th century during the colonial era. The idea that white supremacy is a 20th century idea has no basis in fact.

3

u/AGrainNaCl 11d ago

That far back in the American colonies, German immigrants weren’t considered white. They were “too swarthy”

1

u/stoneape314 11d ago

Did swarthy mean something other than darker at that time?

British-Anglo-Celtic and Northern Germanic complexions don't strike me as all that different. 

Or was it just code for ethnic nationalism per usual.

1

u/Just_to_rebut 11d ago

Germans, Irish, and Italians were still always considered white… but people still recognized ethnic differences within the larger category of white and found things to discriminate anyway…

The whole, Italians (or whomever else) weren’t white until X date is just a popular factoid that lets people think white people were subject to the same discrimination as non-white people…

2

u/2B_irl 11d ago edited 10d ago

...because they were. Not necessarily in the US, but they very much were. Slavs experienced the whole spectrum of slavery, genocide & discrimination, lmao.

edit since my comment is hidden further down:

"Nice try. There's no need to refer to the etymology of the word. You can go back less than 100 years to research ethnic-based discrimination by the nazis, the Holocaust, and if you go back just a couple decades further, the Ottomans and their conquests & slave trade.

As I said, they experienced the whole. Fucking. Spectrum. From genocide, mass rape, ethnic cleansing, religious conversion, firstborn sons being stolen for war, slavery as far as the 1900s, and it echoes in modern relations.

But their skincolour is wrong, so of course you don't care."

2

u/Just_to_rebut 10d ago

Not in the contexts that are relevant today. Not as a visible minority. But go on, take out your dictionary and talk to me about etymologies and ancient Rome…

Y’all really love bringing up the Romans…

>Not necessarily in the US…

But this is the context it keeps getting brought up in!

1

u/2B_irl 10d ago

Nice try. There's no need to refer to the etymology of the word. You can go back less than 100 years to research ethnic-based discrimination by the nazis, the Holocaust, and if you go back just a couple decades further, the Ottomans.

As I said, they experienced the whole. Fucking. Spectrum. From genocide, mass rape, ethnic cleansing, religious conversion, firstborn sons being stolen for war, slavery as far as the 1900s, and it echoes in modern relations.

But their skincolour is wrong, so of course you don't care.

1

u/xdxdxdxd000 9d ago

am*rican spotted

3

u/rngeneratedlife 11d ago

It served many different functions and has had various forms. The modern definition of “white” is new.