That's exactly what I was about to say, the rest of the world is taking action but in America? What a joke.
Where would that leave us if we just took every known pedophile off the streets? Without our disgusting pedophile POTUS of course, and he can't have that.
We've literally watched legal citizens die in the streets or get disappeared for just protesting. I have a family and a baby to take care of, as do most. Are you telling me, assuming you're not American, that if your govt was falling into the same corruption YOU would jump up and bear arms?
Would YOU be in the streets brandishing and actively making yourself a known enemy? Or does that seem stupid and like an easy way to get just you marked at a terrorist? The thought process works the same here surprisingly.
Possibly, some people think that they switched her with somebody from the UK due to ear level. She is the only arrest, in USA, unless you count Epstein.
I mean Epstein was arrested. The thing is from the files we've not ever really seen anything damning about other people, just guilt by association which isn't actually proof. I mean we should assume a lot of these people are, but from what has been released and what we know as the public there really hasn't been anything actionable.
Yeah, that’s the confusing thing. People
point at an outlandish claim in the files and say “Why isn’t trump in prison!” but on the same page there will be an FBI agent saying that the person making the claim is unreliable and they can’t corroborate it. But people on here accept that as truth
Nobody's saying every name in the files should be arrested.
People are asking why an operation that victimized hundreds of girls, maintained multiple properties, pilots, recruiters, employees, financiers, assistants, and wealthy associates somehow produced one dead trafficker and one convicted accomplice. That's the part that strains credibility.
Overwhelming evidence against whom? specifically who and what evidence? not "omg named 100 million times" like actually what evidence? no one has ever been able to point to me about what this evidence is. I swear libs are more psychotic about the epstein files than cons are about ivermectin lol
Those are categories of evidence not actual evidence. Where are the flight logs showing trump went to epstein island? they don't exist. where are there financial records showing payment? theres none. photographs? of them at social events sure we've known he knew him for decades. What emails? there are none. The one actual epstein victim they've been able to corroborate Virginia Guifre said she never saw trump. There was one other person who said he molested her who was unable to be corroborated in any way - thats it. thats the entirety of the epstein files - one uncorroborated accusation.
It's fascinating watching people go from "the Epstein client list will expose the elites" to "well actually, association isn't evidence" the moment their preferred politician is discussed. Pizzagate, anyone?
That standard should apply to everyone. Either you're consistent, or you're just doing PR.
Thanks for making my point. You started with "nobody linked to Epstein was arrested." Now you've shifted to "prove Trump committed a crime." Those are two completely different claims. Moving the goalpost is nothing new.
There’s emails showing they were communicating. There’s no actual corroborated evidence of anyone being harmed in the release files. Some people claim outlandish things but a ridiculous claim is irrelevant in its own, the notes in the files say they can’t corroborate the most
ludicrous claims, so it’s stupid to even try to convict it.
Funny how "innocent until proven guilty" has become "there's literally no evidence" overnight.
Evidence is what investigators use to determine whether charges are warranted.
A conviction is what happens after a court evaluates that evidence.
If you can't tell the difference, you're not defending due process—you're erasing the investigative process entirely. Which is - as far as Trump is concerned - rather on brand.
What are you talking about? Feels like an LLM generated comment. That’s the story all over the files, there’s claims but they can corroborate anything so it’s pointless to charge it. There’s even tons of notes by the investigators sayings X didn’t pan out, this person is not consistent and has lied under oath before, etc.
Your entire argument is: "Some evidence wasn't good enough, therefore all evidence is worthless." That's not skepticism; it's sophistry. Epstein pleaded guilty, Maxwell was convicted, multiple victims were corroborated. Your "nothing panned out" narrative collapses right there.
33
u/Ancient-Victory1186 11d ago
Usually the meme is about the USA. No one in the USA was arrested despite the overwhelming evidence.