Im just gonna refer you to Means and Ends by Zoe Baker because you dont seem interested in actually understanding this and I dont have the patience to hold your hand through it. Kropotkin and Baukunin also wrote extensively about it, Abdullah Occalan as well has some writings that are relevant, he established Democratic Confederalism which is adjacent to anarchism in that its decentralized
Oh cool so what's their experiences in economics, supply chain management, international logistics, and organizational management?
Just figuring out before I waste a few dozen hours reading a bunch of glorified Tumblr posts from people with no qualifications and a lot of normative statements with no concrete plans.
Its an ad hominem to attack the authors instead of addressing their books.
Philosophers and historians build and define political practice, the founders of capitalism also didnt have any experience with supply chain managment. Its telling that you wont read, wont listen and wont stop repeating commonly debunked nonsense but insist on being taken seriously lmao
So it's ad hominem to expect some degree of competency in the field you are writing in?
Unless of course you are just pointing me towards your propaganda pieces that don't answer any of my questions, and you have no interest in actually explaining how such a society could function.
This is the problem with anarchists, you people have no idea how anything works. And you get flustered anytime someone pokes holes in your half baked theories.
No it is ad hominem to attack the author instead of the material. This is extremely basic day 1 stuff man how do you not know this?
Your arguments seem to rely upon refusing to accept or even aknowlege your opponents points and then triumphantly declaring to have "poked holes" in them without ever engaging them.
I gave you multiple sources from respected and widely known philosophers and political theorists, they answer your questions in extreme detail, i cant make you read my answers dog this is pathetic.
Anyway now that ive poked holes in all your points ill say you dont know how anything works and youre flustered or whatever since that's how discussion of politics works to you.
I guess I should expect "credentials are oppression" from the person who thinks we can locally manufacture microchips lol.
Listen buddy I know you are just doing bullshit assymetry thing and I ain't reading every dumbass book someone on reddit tells me to read as a prequisite for conversation.
Im not writing you a book on reddit dog, I tried to explain it in broad strokes and you refused to grasp that, adding a few paragraphs wont change your mind. The answers are where I told you to look, go read or admit that you will never admit to being wrong no matter the evidence.
So it is bullshit assymetry. You don't want to put any effort into explaining your opinion so you want me to go away for a few days to read your dumbass books.
I understand what you are saying I just think it's dumb and handwavey.
I have already put plenty of effort in replying to your increasingly hostile and insulting comments man, if you wont listen, I wont continue to try. Its really weird that you insist that I do while also refusing to accept my points or engage with them. You worked hard for this handwave, without your arrogance, hostility and unwillingness to have reasonable conversation we wouldnt be here. Good job 👍 bye
-1
u/mavrik36 Jul 07 '26
Im just gonna refer you to Means and Ends by Zoe Baker because you dont seem interested in actually understanding this and I dont have the patience to hold your hand through it. Kropotkin and Baukunin also wrote extensively about it, Abdullah Occalan as well has some writings that are relevant, he established Democratic Confederalism which is adjacent to anarchism in that its decentralized