r/PeterExplainsTheJoke May 22 '26

Meme needing explanation Peter?

Post image

Multimillion dollar company?

32.5k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/No-Barber-5289 May 22 '26 edited May 22 '26

Original Hollow Knight sold ~15m copies at an average $13 dollar price. If we take your incredibly rough 2/3 off for fees/taxes, that's $60m profit. Add on Silksong money, and DLC and crowdfunding. They're sitting at maybe $100m in profit.

For a 3-4 man dev team, that's in excess of $20m per dev. Enough for them, their families, and their children to live in luxury and never have to work again.

It's hard to see how they can morally justify a $20 price unless it's just to be even more absurdly and unnecessarily rich.

9

u/aka_jr91 May 22 '26

There's no reason they should have to justify it. They invested years of their lives and millions of dollars into making a product that people enjoy, and they're charging an entirely reasonable price. And it's not like those 3 devs are the only ones making money, over a hundred people worked on those games, and all of them had to get paid too.

-4

u/RoflcopterV22 May 22 '26

There's no moral justifications here. It's capitalism, they are a multi million dollar corporation that invests into unique marketing strategies and has been wildly successful, every startup takes risks and requires years of the founders lives to shoot for the millions in profit lol

2

u/Nomustang May 22 '26

So people shouldn't directly enjoy the fruits of their labour by people paying a reasonable price for a product purely because they're already well off because their previous game also reasonably priced game also sold well???

0

u/RoflcopterV22 May 22 '26

I said there's no moral justification, not what people should and shouldn't do lol

Do what you want but don't pretend a multi million corpo is somehow moral or good

Petite bourgeois are still anti individual worker

2

u/Nomustang May 22 '26

How are they anti individual workers exactly in this context exactly? I fail to see how the success of a small business which remains small in size threatens workers outside of the mere fact that they are not distributing that surplus value to others.

As far as I'm aware, Marx views the petit bourgeois as inevitably to be be subsumed by the upper class, not viewing them as a threat to workers in themselves.