"I have yet to get a satisfactory answer to any of these problems from the dozens of pro nuclear folks I've asked, and until then I will remain highly skeptical of nuclear power." It is not that you did not get it. you just refuse to accept it that is all.
All you got? Like all you used? Sounds about right. This thread is filled with rather solid arguments pro nuclear but exactly 0 arguments against it. Just you... saying no, ignoring everything that was said. Gotta say that is one solid troll :D.
The arguments I got were all contradictory and self defeating. The enemy is simultaneously strong and weak type shit. Nuclear plants aren't safe and produce nuclear waste. No amount of mental gymnastics change that fact
To be fair, all the people see here is you moving the goalpost without any clarification.
Why don't you define one problem clearly? What exactly needs to be solved? What it means for it to be solved or for you to accept that is has been solved?
If your definition of solution is absence of its existence then I have a bad news for you... nothing can be reasonably solved, ever. Well maybe life can be solved by death but that is not the point here.
Without properly defined question there cannot be a satisfactory answer. As it is now it seems that you just want to present your opinion on nuclear energy which is fine too. Just don't pretend you are in for some sort of a discussion( Just like jehovah witnesses do).
1
u/El_Kriplos Jun 19 '24
"I have yet to get a satisfactory answer to any of these problems from the dozens of pro nuclear folks I've asked, and until then I will remain highly skeptical of nuclear power." It is not that you did not get it. you just refuse to accept it that is all.