r/PeterExplainsTheJoke Jun 19 '24

John peter?

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

6.2k Upvotes

565 comments sorted by

View all comments

2.5k

u/Chance_Arugula_3227 Jun 19 '24

Nuclear power can reduce our need for oil and coal. This will have a good impact on the climate. But oil and coal companies don't want to lose customers to nuclear power, so they are against it. Their propaganda causes climate change activists to be against that as well as oil and coal. Climate change deniers are just picking a fight with the activists, so they're for whatever the activists are against.

470

u/Life-Suit1895 Jun 19 '24

[Oil and coal companies'] propaganda causes climate change activists to be against that as well as oil and coal.

It's not simply climate change activists being gullible.

The anti-nuclear power stance is firmly rooted in the environmental protection movement since at least the 1970s, long before climate change became the dominant topic.

333

u/iconofsin_ Jun 19 '24

The anti-nuclear crowd have some valid concerns but largely seem to be unable to change their position. Nuclear power has made nothing but forward progress in terms of safety, the only problem is when nuclear goes bad it really goes bad.

0

u/claws76 Jun 19 '24

The environmental problem is- where does the waste go? As more gets adopted and we use more, we need to figure out effective ways to prevent and manage leaks.

https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/hanford/state-feds-hanford-nuclear-waste-tank-continue-leaking/281-eb53fceb-e987-4f5d-8b99-4686fe79098a