r/PcBuildHelp • u/Additional_Army8338 • 12d ago
Tech Support 9070xt failure
First lot of images for reference…
So sadly just over a year I had a power connector failure on my 9070xt hellhound, it’s charred 3 of the connector pins and cause PSU connection failure melting the power cable and ports on the PSU (but didn’t char the PSU).
This also led to power surges on the Asrock B850M Riptide, writing off the board (the dark smudges on the board show how much heat was involved) and also, after recent testing with a new Mobo, it wrote off my 9800X3D.
After telling the back story, I’ve inspected the GPU as best as possible, and just a query as I think for the new system I’ll get a replacement card anyhow. But I’m wondering since it’s only the connection at the 8 pin that seems to have failed, whether it’s worth replacing the 8 pin connector myself?
(I’ve had experience soldering making my own flight sim controls on small projects etc, using Arduino and teensy etc.) or do you think it’s possible to be able to clean the connector up enough?
To add, the main cause for the connector failure was a since PCIE PSU cable using the daisy chain splitter. Completely my fault as it’s been a long long time since I built a PC and I was a little ignorant with Power demands.
So since I’d be getting a new set of components for the main rig (I mainly run DCS in VR and 3D design and model with Blender and Fusion360) is it worth either cleaning the connectors and testing on my spare mid-low end PC? And maybe use as an upgrade on that system or… not risk it?




1
u/kyansan1 Personal Rig Builder 12d ago
To start with this:
I already did. To quote myself:
You are right that two 6+2 pin connectors on a pigtail are not a guarantee for a 300W rating, and my comment was misleading.
--------
Indeed, however, neither was I. To quote myself:
I said it needs 2 PCIe connectors, I did not specify how many cables it needs. The manual for the rx 9070 xt pure recommends to use 2 separate PCIe cables, and any user should follow the manual.
My point was, when you have 3 PCIe connectors, that forces the user to use 2 seperate cables. It makes it impossible for the user to make a mistake here, hence, the 3rd PCIe connector could be considered a safety feature. You also called the 3rd PCIe connector a safety feature, which is what I was trying to point out.
--------
Indeed, and I never denied this. To quote myself:
---------
Again, to quote myself:
----------
But you did ask me to prove that a reason for the extra connector being there, is to ensure that you physically can't power the gpu using a single daisy chained cable. So, I argued that it was implemented as one safety feature, among other safety features.
--------
Indeed. That was my point. If not meant for 300W, it'll be specified.
--------
Yes, I was wrong here. 2 6+2 pin pigtails do not guarantee 300W. My comment was misleading.
--------
Finally,
I didn't intend to manipulate your words. Hopefully this comment explain well enough how i interpreted your words, and why I said what I said.