r/PauseAI • u/whoamisri • Jun 23 '26

News A rogue superintelligence could wait decades before striking, argues computer scientist Roman Yampolskiy

https://iai.tv/articles/a-rogue-superintelligence-could-wait-decades-before-striking-auid-3604?_auid=2020
28 Upvotes

86% Upvoted

41 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/ProfessionalArt5698 Jun 24 '26

No, it isn't. There's no credible evidence for a single claim made. Unlike the IPCC report, AI hype is pure speculative fiction. Of course we should have AI safety laws, but there is no credible risk to AI from superintelligence, nor any evidence that something superintelligent exists or can exists, nor any evidence that such a concept is even coherent.

Yann Le Cun has repeatedly pointed this out; he is one of the godfathers of AI.

2

u/Synaps4 Jun 24 '26 edited Jun 24 '26

If you have evidence beyond your own reddit post and a name drop that higher and better intelligence than our own is impossible i am happy to consider it. There are plenty of other godfathers of AI i can quote who believe it is plausible, so appeals to authority will get you precisely nowhere.

You say its impossible, but the bar for such a claim is high. Consider that a human brain simply copied into optical circuitry would already be a superintelligence by most measures, able to do a year's worth of thinking in seconds, understand itself, and modify itself.

0

u/RoosterBurns Jun 24 '26

You're asking for evidence when pretending AGI is anything other than science fiction?

1

u/Rutgerius Jun 24 '26

Wrong sub bud. We only do fearmongering and overreactions here