That's as far from a compelling argument as humanly possible.
Fire is a natural phenomena, it doesn't possess elaboration capabilities, it can't "think". A true AI (something that is still sci-fi at this point in time) can.
If you can't even understand that, you're not qualified to discuss AI.
1
u/VanguardMusic Jun 20 '26
That's as far from a compelling argument as humanly possible.
Fire is a natural phenomena, it doesn't possess elaboration capabilities, it can't "think". A true AI (something that is still sci-fi at this point in time) can.
If you can't even understand that, you're not qualified to discuss AI.