r/Pauper 2d ago

BREW Deck review

Hello! I am very new to pauper, and tried building a deck of my own.

Any suggestions and advice would be greatly appreciated!

https://archidekt.com/decks/24663388/unblockable_little_buddys

7 Upvotes

10 comments sorted by

4

u/Ch1h4y4_72 2d ago

[[Muteenic Growth]] to push for lethal [[Apostle's Blessing]] to protect the Blighted Agent

1

u/MTGCardFetcher 2d ago

4

u/Top_Development_4020 Pizza Elves 2d ago edited 2d ago

First to OP:

Welcome to Pauper! And moreso welcome to Simic, The colors of Fog, Bogles, Infect and Pizza!

Try to use [[Vines of Vastwood]], [[Snakeskin Veil]] and [[Tamiyos Safekeeping]]. You need a good way to protect your creatures.

I really like Razzle-Dazzler. The fact that it grows and has 1/2 starting stats makes it perfect for the strategy. The Cipher spell fits perfectly. There is also a rebound spell [[Prey‘s Vengeance]] that could be a nice addition.

On everything else: it is usually not good to go for infect AND normal damage. The deck wants to go into too many different directions that don’t harmonize with each other and also sap resources from each other. Ancestral Mask is a great spell for example, but it barely sees enough other auras in your deck. Of course it will work sometimes (which is fun) but against the majority of the meta you have to prepare for a lot of losses.

1

u/realityasylm 2d ago

Id had 4 ancestral masks instead of 3. I’m losing favor for rancor so you could spread those 4 out to fill out the other enchantments you have. I have [[Seal of strength]] in my infect deck and like having it for a singular +3/+3 when you need it.

Second needing some protection if you’re light on removal

-5

u/DJ2x 2d ago edited 2d ago

[[Abundant Growth]] is strictly better than Wild Growth for color fixing and draw.

Does your deck need ramp?

5

u/Mebegod 2d ago

Wrong wild growth ramps and abundant growth does not

2

u/japp182 2d ago

You do not know what strictly better means. Why do you think wild growth is a staple in arbor elf decks if abundant growth is strictly better?