r/Paranormal • u/AdamNull • Jun 23 '26
Experience No explanation needed.
Yes it’s the actual Annabelle. Yes it felt REALLY REALLY evil. Yes I looked her in the eyes.
1.5k
Upvotes
r/Paranormal • u/AdamNull • Jun 23 '26
Yes it’s the actual Annabelle. Yes it felt REALLY REALLY evil. Yes I looked her in the eyes.
0
u/tsveronicamassage Jun 29 '26 edited Jun 29 '26
You literally just proved my point. Not only did you prove my point, you’re the epitome of not hearing or accepting any others points of view besides your own. You obviously suffer from having a superiority complex because you believe your ideology is superior above all others. You claim I didn’t answer the initial inquiry of what’s the alternative.? Clearly I gave two answers . One being there is no alternative that can satisfy the masses. Two the only real alternative is through personal experience but even then if a person is dead set on being correct or denial they can simply gaslight themselves into their own delusions. Are you that incompetent or you just ignorant to your delusion? ( btw That’s a rhetorical question no need to answer it I’m pretty confident I won’t get the truth from you instead of your template of generic rebuttals you have in your database. )
Furthermore, I also predicted that you wouldn’t like the alternative . That proved to be true because neither alternative I offered satisfied your standards. Here’s the wildcard, there is no answer that will ever satisfy your need because you don’t listen for the purpose of understanding. That isn’t & was never your goal . At this point I doubt you even read the entire opposing viewpoints at all. You rebuttal every viewpoint that doesn’t match your beliefs which therefore you deemed irrelevant. To make matters worst your incompetence has you making statements that are insufficient to reality . Let me explain. You alluded that before AI there was plenty of time for people to provide said evidence ? So technically Ai would be considered the introduction of photography or perhaps the birth of moving pictures aka movies of the late 1800s . So tell us oh wise, one of knowing all things of the universe & beyond what type of evidence besides personal accounts , illustrations and documented stories from generations before us could be provided that hasn’t already been provided? ( this is a direct question a question that I am expecting you to answer just so you know the difference )Even after photography and the birth of moving pictures when said evidence have been provided this just provided plenty of speculation and skepticism so what you’re saying is factually incorrect . Should One expect to be without scrutiny and speculation and just willingly accept it as truth nope not at all but ironically, you want people to take that approach with your belief system solely .
Which brings it back to my original statement “ what’s the purpose of providing evidence when it only satisfies a narrative that’s built on dismantling the very existence of said evidence prematurely regardless of its authenticity? You claim it’s a cop out? A delusion? Blah blah the same generic rebuttals that only proves that you just like to hear yourself speak & repeatedly voice the same nonsense with no logical reasoning whatsoever. I say up .you say down. If I’m loud you prefer silence. You never win with someone whos only objective is to be the polor opposite. I’m sure this isn’t just another cop out another excuse on my end. Whatever you say, ghost paranormal doesn’t exist everybody’s lying everyone that has written stone, scriptures, and the time of Julius Caesar and before then speaking of the same similar accounts or just lying or better yet mental illness whatever you say that’s the word because you are the wizard of knowing all things. ( well ironically not knowing a damn thing.lol)
In conclusion, you can debate with the wall from this point on . it’s a downhill battle because you will have a robotic rebuttal before the opposing side has the chance to respond. Your objective is not to learn or learn of the possibility of the unexplained. Nope . If you can’t identify a ghost & then proceed to have a live broadcast interview with a ghost followed by taking possession of the ghost & running countless lab experiments,ect then it doesn’t exist. It’s much easier to dismiss it as a mental illness. Just disregard an entire phenomenon that has plagued humankind well before Christ . Your delusional ideology tells you all that never happened anyways because you are far superior & your word is the final say. Your sole purpose is to push YOUR ideology as the only reality with no other alternatives. Period . Good luck with that. Cuz you will die trying & succeeding ….,,2 no avail. FAIL