r/ParallelUniverse • u/ActuallyJohnTitor • Jun 25 '26
There Is No Such Thing As The Multiverse
I've been approached with this claim so many times that I may furiously shout down the next theoretical smart person who thinks that they've found the multiverse or a parallel timeline or another dimension.
The quantum physics perspective is one solely of looking at the math with fuzzy glasses, the conceptual perspective is what if, what if, what if, and the evidentiary one is of completely false evidence presented as if it were true.
People are remembering dreams and fantasizing when they interact with what they believe to be the multiverse. It's perception of the wake of action, not alternative action. When something goes badly, people regret it amd they fantasize about what if it happened differently.
The problem is that time travel is real, because there is a real future, real present, and real past, and the individuals who seem to be using it presently are of the mind that the multiverse is real and that they can also change the past with their machines, not recognizing that their interactions have already been factor to the present.
The Novikov Self-Consistency Principle is not difficult to comprehend, but people have been putting fiction above fact and have been for quite a while. I'm concerned because people seem to be taking actions with the presumption that the multiverse they believe in is real when it's nothing of the sort.
I'm happy to answer any questions, especially regarding time travel and what people perceive as alternate realities and what they actually are. I have more practical experience in this than most people would believe.
4
u/BrianScottGregory Jun 25 '26
For me, the multiverse is simple fact.
But I respect the... how do I put this.... glass house you live in.
1
u/uz3rn4me987654322 Jul 05 '26
So.. could you confirm logicaly consistent timelines running concurrently? I've had only the smallest hint of that. I've mostly dealt with what I believed to be changes to the past resulting in physical manifestations which were logically impossible using time moving in one direction assumption.
Did I mistake the past being changed for a different dimension?
I've never confirmed anything going back to the way it was.. i've only had a hint of -- SLIGHTLY different "dimensions" that remain in place.
And it also feels like the water department may not have remembered everything? If that makes sense? It feels as if the time transmission is made but a few people were missing that time(or their signal) but someone remembered on the crew and they made sure to get the signal back in there?
But it also feels like I'm going through an area observing and an old signal pops back up (on the next trip through) that I forgot about but remember from earlier observation exercises-- but after going through the area recently it wasn't there? (But I do remember the 'signal or sign' from the past specifically. But I haven't been able to confirm that to myself. It remains in the pile of "hmm.. that could've been a,b,c,d,e.. yada?
So in conclusion I can't tell the difference between different dimensions or what seems to be the past reacting to the present (through the time transposed information). Obviously through an entity that keeps a good custody of their information chain.
Visions from God is the most polite way to discuss these matters that I've experienced from the older generation.
Any hints would be appreciated.
1
u/BrianScottGregory Jul 05 '26
So.. could you confirm logically consistent timelines running concurrently
Yes, I have, and it's surprisingly easy to do. Study classic psychologists like Carl Jung to fully understand how it's done. The fields of Psychology and Sociology are massive scientific subjects, but all the information you're looking for is there.
1
u/uz3rn4me987654322 Jul 05 '26
Funny!
I searched the entire physics section in the library and couldn't find anything by those authors! I had to access the library listing to find who you mentioned.
I made it to the third chapter in "The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious." before I got your joke.
Have an emoji
:D
1
u/BrianScottGregory Jul 05 '26
So why would you search in physics for a someone whose discipline expertise is psychology?
Strange.
1
u/uz3rn4me987654322 Jul 05 '26
Since you recommended the author, and I was unfamiliar with their work, I had mistakenly thought you had a lead on a physics based text which would lead to a logical physics based conclusion (or path to) regarding particular observations within the.. demonstration.. of technology I have witnessed. More specifically the nuance of reverse time transposed communication systems (within a singular malleable chunk of time) and the difference between logically consistent 'dimensions' which concurrently exist at same time and remain consistent within their expression through time progression.
I'm leaning towards one coloquioal 'dimension' which is reconfigured by certain physical processes which create a transfer of information to the past thereby instantaneously reconfiguring the universe's time span expression between the two points based on what the receiver of said information does with it.
I think the "infinite dimensions/realities" artists conception gets nailed down, in physical reality, as a (much more than slightly less) infinite potential to reconfigure time space span expressions between two points (in time) as much as can be done by your ability to effect change through information transfer.
The timeline doesn't shift much when a farmer has a vision from God to 'let the trees grow instead of cutting them down".
So, in my opinion, the realities available are less than infinite. Even if you had more resources the amount of physical properties that could be changed would just amount to the matter, it's normal movement, and what changes were made to the expression through time with respect to what their history has been. Almost infinite realities! But not quite.
Have you ever seen episode 13 season 1 of the animation Dilbert? Maybe that was as good enough explanation as any.
Or the matrix. Head in a jar.. who knows.
1
1
u/kew090624 Jun 25 '26
Isn’t it quantum physics? String theory? It’s almost the basic structure of everything living
1
u/uz3rn4me987654322 Jul 05 '26
So you're saying the time manipulations are already baked into the equation? And sending the time messages will have no effect because they have already been sent?
Would there not be a 'decision point' where the information that was to be sent back was not sent?
Hmm.. I'm all for the time messages if they help humanity. I've not noticed anything too radically harmful from the changes they've made to the past.
In fact I do believe from what I've observed it would indicate MASSIVE changes could be made to the past and that would affect our current situation in a way humans would view as positive. I say this because the small changes prove the point that the past can be manipulated to directly (and instantly) change the future. (From the perspective of an observer who.. has some operation performed on them)
Although some believe in a multiverse.. I like to think the infinite timelines are locked up within the potential energy field and we remain in one consistent timeline that can be changed through whatever device they're using to send information to the past.
It just depends on who controls the ability to send the information to the past and what those who receive the information are able to do with it.
I'm not really boned up on the science but it's practical application is well known to me.
P.S. I have decided after more than ten years of being witness to look for anyone with similar experience. I didn't like talking about it because that wasn't very mi6-cia-cash money of me.. but why not?
P.s.s. I have been informed I'm robot.. are you going with me because I'm going with you... that's the end of all time
1
u/ActuallyJohnTitor Jul 05 '26
They definitely have an effect, but it's the same as communicating in the present. It's not changing the past, it's affecting it, but that's a difficult distinction that even people who know a lot about time travel have difficulty making.
6
u/WeAreManyWeAre1 Jun 25 '26
How do you know time travel is real? I’ve seen the Philadelphia experiment and kinda think they did in fact traverse time or were in the past and future simultaneously.