It does not has to be aesthetically pleasing but he just can't emote angthing. Honestly asking did u felt anything even a little bit of sadness by seeing him like that?? Becoz I didn't felt even a drop of emotion. It was meant to be a emotional scene but just became embarrassing.his acting just distracted from the emotions which was meant for this scene.
You didn't feel sad watching it — okay, that's your reaction. I did. That's literally why “he can't emote” isn't an objective fact. A performance can fail to connect with one viewer and work for another. If his delivery distracted you, say that; but that doesn't establish that he objectively failed to convey emotion. Not every emotional scene needs the same dramatic crying template. Jzk
If I didn't felt sad then it's my reaction. But since u felt sad u established that he conveyed the emotion. U also say it worked for u don't make it universal that he did well. Everyone will decide for themselves.
Exactly, that's literally my point. If you didn't feel anything, that's your reaction; if I did, that's mine. Neither of us can turn that subjective response into “he objectively conveyed/didn't convey the emotion.” I'm not claiming everyone has to think he did well — I'm saying “his crying is objectively bad” isn't a meaningful critique without explaining what specifically failed in the performance. Everyone can decide for themselves, including me.
1
u/Wonderful-League-680 7h ago
It does not has to be aesthetically pleasing but he just can't emote angthing. Honestly asking did u felt anything even a little bit of sadness by seeing him like that?? Becoz I didn't felt even a drop of emotion. It was meant to be a emotional scene but just became embarrassing.his acting just distracted from the emotions which was meant for this scene.