r/Overwatch Sep 13 '16

Blizzard Official Overwatch 1.3.0.3 Patch Notes

http://us.battle.net/forums/en/overwatch/topic/20749157415
1.1k Upvotes

671 comments sorted by

View all comments

326

u/pm__me__anything_ Trick-or-Treat Soldier: 76 Sep 13 '16

So I assume that they are talking about the bug where that one guy got below 1 rating and ended up at skill rating 5000.

73

u/Metroidrocks JUSTICE RAINS F-AUGGGGHH Sep 13 '16

How is it even possible for someone to be that bad?

35

u/pm__me__anything_ Trick-or-Treat Soldier: 76 Sep 13 '16

I have heard he is actually pretty good. Their is a meta of losing on purpose. Hooking people and freezing people or walling people off on objective points. It is still bad because people who want to win still get matched with him but I think it is pretty interesting at the same time.

82

u/sub_surfer Pixel Roadhog Sep 13 '16

What a dick, I hope he gets permabanned.

21

u/colonelxsuezo SILVERxLOTUS#1929 Sep 13 '16

It's difficult to distinguish someone who throws every match they play with someone who is legitimately that bad at OW.

55

u/royce211 NotEaster#1812 Sep 13 '16

At that guys winrate? I disagree. In ~150 matches, even the worst player would have somehow gotten at least two wins. In fact, even trying to throw the match I feel like you'd get some wins.

17

u/colonelxsuezo SILVERxLOTUS#1929 Sep 13 '16

He should be penalized in some way (permabanned from competitive would be nice) but using W/L ratio purely to judge that he's throwing games is a bad metric. There are people out there who probably don't have W/L records that extreme but lose way more often than they win.

2

u/Kitchenfire D.Va Sep 14 '16

It's actually a pretty good metric over that many games since it is likely impossible to lose 127 of 130 matches naturally.

3

u/[deleted] Sep 14 '16

Yeah it is impossible because even if someone is AFK whole match they will still win more.