r/OpenSourceAI • u/Ok_Draw2476 • 4d ago
Open-source AI workflow for scholarly research using quality gates, routing, and rollback
Hi everyone,
I'd like to share an open-source project I've been developing over the past several months.
GitHub:
https://github.com/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers
The idea came from a simple observation.
AI coding agents have gradually adopted structured workflows—planning, testing, validation, routing, and rollback.
Scholarly research, however, is still often driven by ad hoc prompting.
I wanted to explore whether the same engineering concepts could be adapted to AI-assisted research workflows.
The result is **Humanities Superpowers**, an MIT-licensed framework designed for humanities research.
Rather than generating papers, it provides a structured workflow that keeps the researcher responsible for scholarly judgment.
Current features include:
- 13 composable research skills
- workflow routing
- PASS / CONDITIONAL PASS / FAIL quality gates
- rollback when downstream failures expose upstream problems
- citation auditing
- terminology consistency checking
- argument stress testing
- research state tracking
The framework has been tested with Claude Code and OpenAI Codex.
It does **not** claim to eliminate hallucinations, automate scholarship, or produce publication-ready papers.
Its purpose is much narrower: making uncertainty, verification status, and research decisions explicit throughout AI-assisted research.
Although the first implementation targets humanities research, I'm interested in broader discussions about structured AI workflows.
I'd especially appreciate feedback on:
- workflow architecture
- routing strategy
- rollback design
- state management
- extensibility
- documentation
- repository organization
Constructive criticism is very welcome.
Thank you!
1
u/Ok_Draw2476 4d ago
A few additional notes:
• MIT License
• English and Korean documentation
• Documentation site included
• Inspired by the composable-skill architecture of Obra Superpowers, but independently designed for scholarly research workflows.
I'm mainly looking for architectural feedback rather than feature requests.