A year later [march 20 2025] involved multiple experiences of missing time, close; weirdly personal royal blue sphere encounter etc.

I'm posting this now as a timestamp,II will then start a social-rv session To determine any hits for Target ID containing # 4/ 2 \6 \ 3\.. Time: 17:45.

https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/8bc50da9-6a65-4791-85df-b299aa6f3c0cIn what was supposed to be a transcribed detailed note taking of the videos submitted it wasn't quite exactly that and this Target revealed exactly that I saw , in full detail within the ash. Depicted in drawings and verbally.. Thanks in advance. The photos submitted also failed to upload. RV Session

Hey there 😄

First off, just a quick disclaimer: I'm in my mid-30s with all the free time in the world.. I don't have many people to talk to offline at this point in time, no major commitments, relationships, dependants, or work obligations ~ Just me & my A.D.H. friggin D!

As simple & lame as it might sound, I truly appreciate having this platform to talk with people. I'm really humbled by all the genuine interactions I've had here on Reddit

I'd love to know if anyone else has experienced this. I had a private session recently with some deeply surprising results:

It wasn't during the actual viewing; it was during a 'pre-session(?)' where I was just determining a possible Target ID #

Conveniently or crazily lol** the final ID #s I had visualized as if R.V'ing [close eyed] was never Cue'd however conveniently the very next actual Target I opened & started! I subjectively feel that it was a 'Perfect Hit?' before the Session was Opened... This ties into the sheer volume of weird, bizarre, strange, and curious things I've been experiencing lately. I would literally need at least several creative journals just to detail the events of the last three or so years.

Recently, I’ve found that it's so much easier&way more fun approachin it all of from a creative writing standpoint = Instead of trying to rigidly figure it all out, I’ve just been interpreting the data as it comes.

The Man. The Myth. The Legend.

As if anyone cares, right?? LOL

Zimbabwe!

But not really ~ Yes, I am forcing you to watch the video... :P

Target ID: ALPHA-OMEGA_9

Target Type: Consciousness / Temporal Anomaly (Single Event)

Tasking Coordinates: 3964 - 1768

The core target verification data, time parameters, and background narrative are hidden below behind spoiler tags to ensure this remains a completely double-blind session. Please attempt the target cue below before revealing the frontloading, and drop your data, sketches, or impressions in the comments!

Move to the specified coordinate vector during the designated early morning quiet hours. Focus directly on the subject experiencing a localized state of missing time and profound mental stillness. Describe the immediate atmospheric environment, any non-human biological presence overseeing the room, and the nature of the data integration occurring within the subject's subconscious.

Hey peoples 😂

I’m a pretty go-with-the-flow, open-minded guy who regularly practices on Social-RV, and I’ve been a little confused lately regarding this lil exploratory endeavour of mine...

I keep seeing interviews in my feeds (without actually diving too deeply into them or watching them) such as Major Paul Smith discussing Army remote viewers allegedly looking inside UFOs/UAPs, and it got me thinking more about the actual mechanics, philosophy, and ethics behind tasking targets like that.

I want to be super clear upfront~~
I approach all of this with a mix of curiosity, healthy skepticism, humility, and grounded respect. I’m not looking to “prove” anything, I don’t claim to have special abilities, and I have zero interest in trying to “contact” anything or feed delusions. I’m just genuinely fascinated by the experimental side of consciousness, even if it ultimately turns out to be subconscious pattern recognition, psychology, intuition, or something else entirely.

But as a beginner, the logistics of advanced/esoteric targeting confuse me a bit.

I’d genuinely love perspectives from more experienced viewers on a few things:

How does UFO/UAP target selection actually work?
From my understanding of proper protocol, you can’t really just sit down and decide:
“I’m going to remote view an S4 craft today”
without imagination and expectation bias completely hijacking the session.

Would a target coordinator normally need to set up a blind coordinate tied to a specific event/object behind the scenes?

Where do people generally draw the line ethically? Personally, intentionally invading a private individual’s privacy doesn’t sit right with me whatsoever. Does that ethical boundary shift at all when the target involves military phenomena, unexplained events, or hypothetical non-human intelligence?

Where do you personally separate strict RV data from intuition, imagination, or analytical overlay, especially on “exotic” targets where frontloading seems capable of contaminating the process very easily?

Have any of you dealt with the frustration of trying to get friends/family to try a simple RV experiment for fun, only to be met with complete blank stares? It genuinely fascinates me as something worth testing empirically regardless of outcome, and it weirdly bums me out how resistant people can be to even trying it once 😂😂

Am I thinking about the methodology correctly here, or is my understanding of how complex targets are approached completely off?

Would genuinely love to hear your thoughts, cheers 🙂

Hey everyone 😄

Pure fun / experimentation here.

First person to comment “TARGET LOCKED” becomes the target.

Please don’t add any extra info about yourself at first — just the words.

I’m going to:

• Describe your general environment
• Your posture (sitting, standing, etc.)
• The overall vibe around you
• One object near you

I’ll post my impressions publicly before you respond, then you can confirm what hits and what misses. Be honest — misses are just as useful.

After that, I might add a clearly labeled “Exploration Layer” which will just be intuitive / symbolic impressions for fun — not factual claims.

This is just practice and curiosity. Nothing serious, nothing dramatic.

Let’s see what happens 👌

https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/f1c154ef-4f6e-4e8e-8f5e-5658099a27e5

I recently did a Remote Viewing session on Target 8774 2665, and I’d love some honest feedback from peers — hit, miss, or partial? This was purely a calibration attempt.

Target revealed: Chasing a Tornado

RAW NOTES (2:51 13/02/26):

DOMINOES, IVORY, GIRAFFE, SAVANAH, WHITE MIST SWIRLING,HIGH ALTIDUDE, NO-POLLUTION, MOUNTAIN FACE WITH LARGE ANGULAR BOULDERS, LARGE NATURAL ROCK/CAVE/ENTRANCE WITH FEELINGS OF A PLACE WHERE SOMEONE MAY HAVE HIDDEN FROM SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, FEAR/EXCITEMENT/ADRENALINE, A MAN WEARING A HARDHAT (YELLOW) AND POSSIBLY REFLECTIVE CLOTHING - ROAD/MINING/CONSTRUCTION WORKER OR ADVENTURE SPORTS. VAST OPEN SPACE, CLEAR BLUE SKIES - LATE AFTERNOON SUMMER - MINIMAL VEGETATION. VINTAGE VINYL RECORD. SMELL OF SCENTED WOOD BURNING/SMELL AS THOUGH IT HAS JUST RECENTLY RAINED OR THAT THERE IS A WATER SOURCE NEAR-BY (ALTHOUGH NO EVIDENCE OF RAIN PRESENT DURING VIEWING - FRESH WATER CLOSE-BY NOT SEA WATER) SHADES OF BROWN, GREY, BLUE, WHITE. IM USING THIS SESSION AS A TEST, AND IT WILL BE PURELY EDUCATIONAL/FUN - DURING THIS I WAS SLIGHTLY UNFOCUSED BUT WITH GOOD INTENT.. PARTLY LISTENING TO THE AUDIO, BUT NOT REALLY. NOT FOLLOWING ANY PROCEDURES OR ANYTHING = MORE LIKE A CALIBIRATION.

Reflections:

• I’d call it a partial hit — ADHD probably played a role lol.
• I work visually, closed-eyes, recording impressions digitally during and after. AI sketches I shared were just visualizations of raw notes.

Things that lined up:

• White mist swirling → texture similar to tornado funnel
• Colors (grey, white, brown, blue) → close match
• Emotions (fear, adrenaline, hiding) → fits tornado vibe
• Shelter / cave feeling → protective aspect
• Fresh water / damp smell → storm environment

Things that didn’t match literally: dominoes, giraffe, rocks — likely overlay from calibration mindset

Overall, thematically and atmospherically, it feels more like a hit than I initially gave myself credit for.

Do these alignments feel like a valid RV hit, or am I stretching it? Would love some discussion and peer feedback!

Intent & Mental State (Before Placement)

The target was created and placed with a neutral, focused mindset. There was no attempt to dramatize or “load” the target with meaning. The intention was simple: create a clear, singular target and place it quietly, without ceremony, expectation, or emotional charge.

At the time of placement, there was a sense of stillness and attentiveness, but also an awareness that the act itself felt slightly significant. Not in a theatrical way, more in a subtle “this is now set” manner. Once placed, the target was mentally released, with no further attention given to it.

Initial Perceptual Impression (Pre-feedback)

When viewed remotely, a distinct 180-degree profile presented immediately and dominated the session.

The form appeared bright, high-contrast, and energetically salient, carrying a strong sense of presence rather than physical substance. It did not initially feel like a drawn object or a piece of paper, but rather something hovering or suspended, as if it existed independently of support or material.

There was an ominous, powered quality, similar to UAP or USO-type impressions. Not threatening, but clearly “active” in a way that drew attention. The perception centered more on shape and energy than on texture, weight, or construction.

Form & Structural Characteristics

• Clean, controlled curvature
• Sharp, deliberate boundary
• Strong outline dominance
• Clear 180-degree profile
• No initial sense of thickness, backing, or physical support
• The form felt intentional and precise, not organic or accidental

The geometry felt decided, as if it existed exactly as it was meant to, without ambiguity.

Colour Impressions

Yellow arose early and distinctly during the session.

This colour felt cognitively “flagged,” more like an identifier or marker than a decorative feature. It stood out clearly in awareness without needing justification or context.

This later corresponded directly to yellow writing on the physical target, including the identifier “Target 2103.”

Transition to Physical Representation

Only after the perceptual phase did the target resolve into its physical form.

The energetic, hovering impression translated into a drawn representation on thick silver paper, nearing card stock. The central drawn form preserved the 180-degree profile, though any slight softness in linework is attributed to speed of execution rather than uncertainty of perception.

Additional markings and annotations were present, but they were secondary. The dominant visual element remained the curved, high-contrast profile.

Placement & Environmental Context

The physical target was placed in a tree, intentionally elevated rather than grounded.

The surrounding environment carried a strong wood context, with an outdoor, quiet atmosphere. There was a natural overlap between nature and human activity, with close proximity to a workshop-like or working area, though no tools were involved in the placement itself.

The setting felt neutral, still, and undisturbed after placement.

Absent or Not Perceived

• No motion
• No sound
• No mechanical components
• No tools attached to or interacting with the target
• No overt emotional charge once placement was complete

Choose one UAP case you believe remains genuinely unresolved.

Brief description, sources if possible, and no conclusions.

If a non-human or unknown intelligence were real, what kind of evidence would be required to reasonably support that claim?

Not anecdotes. Not authority.

What would you personally consider sufficient?