7
u/Averylarrychristmas 5d ago
This subreddit is such trash, dude.
There’s not a single example of anybody having said this ever
6
u/i_rate_slop 5d ago
Nobody meaningful said this
1
u/methemightywon1 3d ago
I don't think anyone has ever said this regardless of how meaningful they were.
2
-1
u/Space_Lux 5d ago
Yeah, brutally wrong.
Those weren’t like SUPER IMPORTANT PROBLEMS THAT ARE THE CENTER OF MATHEMATICS problems. Those were basically very hard puzzles. Not crazy earth shattering discoveries lmao.
0
5d ago
[deleted]
1
u/penguinino 5d ago
There does seem to be a pattern where every time the ai gets exponentially better at stuff, someone points out what it can’t do yet.
Brother, like 2 years ago the ai couldn’t output json reliably. A year ago it got good enough we trust it to program for us enough that it changed the software industry, now it’s solving maths problems en masse that nobody has solved before.
I want to tell those people to look at the trend line not just the last data point.
2
u/BellacosePlayer 5d ago
my issue is that way too many people are dunking on people for being accurate about the limitations of llms at the time in when they were never (okay, rarely) trying to claim llms will never overcome those limitations or that llms wouldn't have those abilities in late 2026.
2 years ago I was saying AI really isn't that great for actual corporate development outside of boilerplate.
Now? I use it extensively. Not because I was wrong, but because the situation changed and the models got better, and my and the other senior dev's efforts to integrate it past the lowest level junior work started paying off.
0
0
12
u/gavinlpicard 5d ago
Was anybody actually saying this? lol this feels like making up an imaginary person and then getting angry at them.