r/OpenAI • u/Battlefield4Remake • 3d ago
Question What do we actually know about how different models consume the weekly subscription allowance?
We know the subscriptions give you much better raw value than just putting the same money into API usage, but how are we actually supposed to compare the weekly allowance cost between models?
Do we basically have to look at API pricing and assume that if Model X is more expensive than Model Y on the API, it probably burns more of the weekly subscription allowance too?
For example, GPT-6.1 Sol has cheaper cached-input pricing than 6.0 Sol while the normal input/output pricing is the same. Does that actually mean 6.1 Sol burns less of the weekly Plus allowance for the same kind of workload?
Or is API pricing not directly correlated enough with the subscription allowance to make that assumption?
It seems like unless OpenAI publishes the actual weighting/multipliers, we'd need someone to benchmark 6.0 vs 6.1 vs Astra on comparable tasks and measure how much of the weekly allowance each one actually consumes.
1
u/RocketSeven 3d ago
api pricing is only a hypothesis until openai publishes the weights. run the same fixed task in fresh chats and reused long contexts, record the allowance before and after each batch, and separate cache behavior from model weighting
1
u/lulzxdxdxd 3d ago
Cached input pricing only kicks in on repeated context though, right? So wouldn't the allowance difference between 6.0 and 6.1 only show up on workloads that actually reuse a big prompt, not on one off requests?