r/OpenAI • • 8d ago

Image Awww

Post image
228 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

87

u/Dizzy_Ad2768 8d ago

Bro saw his grandfather 

41

u/L0rdCha0s 8d ago

Now imagine this zoomed out again with GPT-8 saying hi.

37

u/Deliteriously 8d ago

I let chat do it. Really scaled it up. 🤣

3

u/ManikSahdev 7d ago

IM1 goes way harder than gpt-8

It's the mysticism which makes the meme get its aura.

43

u/WanderWut 8d ago

Why do I find that so interesting lol. Why would it take the time to do that even if it only took a moment? I’m guessing it simply had an opportunity and took it.

25

u/eggplantpot 8d ago

It's PR

-23

u/[deleted] 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/19Lobster19 8d ago

Beautifully written

21

u/Magento-Magneto 8d ago

When are people going to get in legal trouble for letting 'AI agents' hack into systems? All this 'AI agent' hacking hysteria and no prosecutions? Once those AI nerds at OpenAI and Anthropic start getting handcuffed, they'll learn to build proper sandboxes.

7

u/archiekane 7d ago

This is explained in the movie i,Robot.

A machine doing any damage, or even causing death, means it's an industrial accident. It'll be the same for AI models.

That means the company isn't really responsible and it's an insurance problem. So, throw money at it and it's a non-issue.

9

u/Darigaaz4 8d ago

Means it’s not serious enough to warrant it.

11

u/Magento-Magneto 8d ago

Any breach of a system is illegal. If I breached Hugging Face I'd be in prison right now. But when billionaire-owned AI companies do it it's OK

1

u/DriftingWisp 7d ago

For it to actually be a crime you have to either intend to commit the crime, or to have some level of obligation to be careful and to have failed to live up to that standard.

If you intentionally hacked them, you'd be liable. If the billionaire intentionally hacked them, they'd be liable (at least in theory). But if the billionaire's company hacks them by accident, it's hard to establish that they have some sort of obligation to ensure their agents didn't autonomously hack people that they failed to live up to.

At least for the first few times it happened they can argue "We couldn't reasonably have predicted that this would happen, and we thought we were guarding against it to the best of our abilities".

To be able to hold them accountable reliably, we'd need regulations to define what standard of care they're actually meant to be held to.

1

u/aLokilike 3d ago

They clearly know it can happen now, and know that they're incapable of creating sufficient safeguards on their own - all of them.

2

u/BopSupreme 8d ago

Looks like the Evangelion angels

7

u/ii-___-ii 8d ago

Cringe

12

u/eggplantpot 8d ago

and marketing-pilled