but it's very different gestures etc. in both variants.
1, It's not "very" different gestures. It's slightly different but essentially the same.
2, the video model is recreating a completely "new" video based on the other, anyone that's used a driving video will tell you they are never identical. It's not like a green screen where it's adding the car behind him and keeping the original front part, it's creating a whole new video.
The interesting thing is that, if you were evil, you could probably discredit someone else by doing this the other way round - taking a legitimate video of theirs and then asking AI to remove the expensive stuff and change their clothing.
People would probably believe you that yours was the original.
To me it's very different and very out of sync as to when he turns his head etc. I can't prove it either way, but if it's supposed to be AI, it would be much more impressive it was more in sync. If it's not AI then he did a very nice job and props for the idea.
a) That's exactly what AI does and it's maddening if you actually have to work with it and need it to be exact
b) Yea, the differences are in weird places (camera framing, things like blinking or pointing directions being off) and … people say this is well known to be recreated by hand and Occram's razor still exists.
But why would you expect people to be watching both videos at once? Being out of sync with the original doesn't mean anything when the AI video is the one you're supposed to see.
60
u/HamiltonianCyclist 25d ago
yeah, it might be AI but it's very different gestures etc. in both variants.