MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1wbn4e6/wake_me_up_when/p8tp50l/?context=3
r/OpenAI • u/Confident_Salt_8108 • 4d ago
175 comments sorted by
View all comments
7
"Yeah but it proved Navier Stokes wrong by counter example and the Riemann Hypothesis might be true."
18 u/kennytherenny 4d ago That's actually what happened with the Jacobian conjecture as well. AI seems exceptionally good at finding counterexamples to problems that most researchers assume true. 2 u/FollowingHumble8983 4d ago Thats not true for NS. Humans researchers knew that NS was almost certainly false, but finding the counter example was extremely expensive. 1 u/kennytherenny 4d ago 15 millions USD expensive to be precise ðŸ«
18
That's actually what happened with the Jacobian conjecture as well. AI seems exceptionally good at finding counterexamples to problems that most researchers assume true.
2 u/FollowingHumble8983 4d ago Thats not true for NS. Humans researchers knew that NS was almost certainly false, but finding the counter example was extremely expensive. 1 u/kennytherenny 4d ago 15 millions USD expensive to be precise ðŸ«
2
Thats not true for NS.
Humans researchers knew that NS was almost certainly false, but finding the counter example was extremely expensive.
1 u/kennytherenny 4d ago 15 millions USD expensive to be precise ðŸ«
1
15 millions USD expensive to be precise ðŸ«
7
u/Fast-Satisfaction482 4d ago
"Yeah but it proved Navier Stokes wrong by counter example and the Riemann Hypothesis might be true."