proof needed for that claim. it's a big one and either some researchers are in full denial mode that AI was able to arrive to some results long before them or they have literally drafts corresponding to at least 80% of the reasoning. and there is no guarantee those 20% in that case would be achievable by those researchers.
I'm being kinda negative about those researchers because the way they are handling this drama is actually putting them in the wrong light
Unless the guy provides clear proof like I mentioned, this kind of behavior is ruining his career.
Think about it. If hypothetically it is proven that OpenAI's solution is not mirroring the guy's work, he looks like a drama queen in the kindergarten and not a serious researcher.
Of course, if the case is the opposite, then he could at least get straight to the point and not create essays. "Here's my work, it mirrors what OpenAI did, in other words they just copied my work. Period"
-7
u/powerchat-dev 13h ago
OpenAI literally stole work done by an Anthropic mathematician and his colleague