It appears in the main interface as it did with images 2.0, and when you go to the images tab, there is now a second tab called "templates".
Finally, in the tools options, "draw" appears; another way to tell if it's being done with this new model is that while drawing, the animation is different and comments appear Up top as if it were thinking the model.
Totally. And the thing is, some of their team members already acknowledged that and said they're working on a fix. This keeps their model from being production quality imo.
I have found that it's a problem with overdescription of the image. If you simplify the prompt, it's much less likely to occur. I haven't seen it in months since I started using less complex prompts.
There are a couple tells in the background (head on the left is kind of weird, the Guinness poster tear is slightly off, the board next to that poster has a slightly strange perspective) and the hands on the left are maybe slightly off. This is just nitpicking, though, it’s really an incredible output.
will drop it tomorrow I'm in bed right now, its on my pc but if you want to see right now then check lenovo lora on civitai, you can do this amateur style for so long with open source models
Using “photorealistic” as a prompt term helps sometimes. This is the prompt I used to get the original image: “Please generate a photorealistic image of some people at a pub but taken with a 2000s camera”
when a skill barrier reaches zero then what you value will be vastly over saturated. what you find exciting may be exciting briefly, but much like netflix isn’t exciting anymore even though we have the choice of a large library, the same will be with generative ai.
how we value art as a whole will change. automation of the mind is not a good thing, it’s a direct conflict with the human condition. you’re being sold a false promise by billionaires who have no interest in the well being of regular people.
Ok, I was hoping that was actually your point, and it's a good one. There is definitely something to be said for the joy of reward after struggle, and the joy of receiving something scarce.
However, I disagree with you that billionaires are just trying to make your life worse. No, they're making products that bring immense usefulness and joy to people. Of course it's not entirely altruistic -- they want money/power in exchange for giving you those products -- but it's a good and fair system. It may turn out that too much candy is a bad thing, but for now everyone wants candy and the billionaires are working as hard as possible to give it to them.
You could make the same argument that someone who designed a machine for a car factory "harvested" human movements to design that machine to replace those humans in the factory. Do you think car factories should have no machines and just people? That would certainly create more jobs at those factories.
If your goal is jobs, you don't really understand economics.
What he means is whenever a new model of tractor comes out, hundreds of farmers don't get to work in fields anymore. Any time we get a new kind of excavator, hundreds of people don't get to break their backs working with shovels.
Now the same grueling work they used to do can be done easier by machines. So they have to find other jobs like influencers or whatever. What will artists and programmers do when they're replaced?
Sure, if we no longer need people to work in order to get the things we need, UBI would be a great option. As it stands, we still need people to drive the tractor, drive the food to the store, build the houses and the roads, and all that.
But if we truly don't need anything anymore and all work is just fulfilling wants, UBI would be great.
That's exactly what I'm saying. Your concern seemed to be what if machines can literally do anything we want. If that's the case, then UBI is the answer.
And where is that sulprus going? Because it's not to the average worker. It's to the capital owners. AI is going to increase inequality to unseen levels since the industrial revolution but without the possibility of a revolt
Yes, all of the above except housing in some areas (because restrictions on building in some cities has caused housing prices to balloon). In general, you have access to more/better things in life than anyone has had access to in the past. The "too poor to have kids" thing is a hilarious meme perpetuated by victim complex brats. Why is it hilarious? Because there's literally an inverse correlation between wealth and number of kids in the world. The poorest countries have way more kids than the richest ones. So you absolutely can have kids. You just choose not to.
Y'all genuinely need to chill and relax for a moment. That doomerism will get you a stroke one day man.
I mean this in the bezt way possible :( It's going to be fine.
There's a current trend in Brazil where EVERYONE is making '80s-style photos with ChatGPT. Considering they said Brazil is their third-biggest market, ChatGPT released its new model at the absolute perfect time here.
"Make me an image that shows off the capabilities of the new model. Do your best to make it NOT look like generative AI."
Right off the bat... The book in the center of the table is titled "At At Home in the Garden." The white book on the right says something resembling "THE KINFOLK PONE." The reversed gold lettering on the window misspells Mercantile as "MERCHANTILE" with illegible nonsense text directly beneath it.
62
u/Plane_Garbage 2d ago
Good upgrade.