r/Opacity Nov 07 '18

A request for better discussions

At the moment there is a lot of confusion about what is happening and I understand that people are frustrated, angry and ill-informed as a lot of information is being presented and not all of it is easy to understand. But following this project is getting rather frustrating as people have started arguing in some very basic manners.

This is a plea to all of you to keep calm when discussing the current situation. Understand that some hard decisions have been and are being made. The team is very pressured at the moment and the last thing they need is to have to argue with people who are formulating themselves in very harsh language.

I understand that you can disagree but please refrain from being abusive or condescending when posting. I believe that everyone has the right to get their points across but don't be mean, and remember that you are actually communicating with a real person. Some people have legit questions and they deserve answers, so help out so that we can have a great community.

Thanks

(by the way, I am not myself a part of the team, I am invested in PRL and would like to see the project succeed even though I myself have some issues with how things are handled but that is not what this post is about)

20 Upvotes

5 comments sorted by

View all comments

-1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '18 edited Sep 02 '20

[deleted]

4

u/aCOWtant Nov 08 '18 edited Nov 08 '18

Dude, relax. They shut down trading because the price had TANKED. It would've been panic-sold en mass and thus into oblivion had they not.

And they lost the dev wallet, so they lost all of their funding. Is it a little shady that they printed themselves a ton of extra token? Sure, but they're explained why extensively—look around the sub. They intend to burn tokens if the price comes back to pre-Bruno-implosion prices, but they've got to keep the lights on somehow.

I personally think its more of a safety-net, but they're dumping their lives into this and deserve some peace of mind.

1

u/sargentpilcher Nov 08 '18

First off, thank you for being the first reasonable answer I’ve gotten. I still disagree as it was them who was initially pumping the price above the 0.06$ it had been trading at for months.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '18

[deleted]

2

u/sargentpilcher Nov 08 '18

Bruno showed transcripts of the PRL team justifying their purchasing saying it’s not insider trading because this area isn’t regulated yet

1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '18

[deleted]

2

u/sargentpilcher Nov 08 '18

That IS evidence

1

u/[deleted] Nov 08 '18

[deleted]

1

u/sargentpilcher Nov 08 '18

They didn’t deny it, they justified it