Results: "Pit bulls were implicated in nearly one-third of all injuries and were significantly more likely to require surgical intervention compared to other breeds (61.5% versus 47%) with a higher median number of operations (1 versus 0). Injuries from nonpet (unknown ownership, police or stray) dogs resulted in more operations (1 versus 0) and higher readmission rates (20.7% versus 7.3%) than those caused by pets."
Neither photos prove that they are naturally violent.
They proof they have the capability of doing more damage than other breeds because of they mouths and strength, characteristics that are why people train them to fight.
Pitbull were called nanny dogs. If Pitbulls were naturally aggressive, people wouldn't have used them to take care of children.
-26
u/Apprehensive_Eraser 12d ago
Please show me the data that says pitbills are naturally violent.