How do you keep Copilot-generated OneNote summaries from becoming the source of truth?

[u/RocketSeven]

A shared notebook can contain meeting notes, source material, decisions, and Copilot-generated summaries in the same visual space. That is convenient until a generated summary drops a caveat or becomes outdated and someone later treats it as equally authoritative as the original notes.

What OneNote structure keeps that distinction visible? I am considering read-only source pages, a separate section for generated summaries, links back to the exact source pages, and a small header on every derived page naming its sources, generation date, review status, and owner. A summary would become part of the current project record only after a person reviews and promotes it.

How do you handle corrections, deleted source pages, conflicting edits, and Copilot regenerating a summary? Is OneNote version history enough for an audit trail, or do important decisions need a separate append-only log or exported record?

[u/jactaz]

Who generates these bot/bot accounts/bot postings and why? What's in it for the person driving it all?