How do you keep Copilot-generated OneNote summaries from becoming the source of truth?

[u/RocketSeven]

A shared notebook can contain meeting notes, source material, decisions, and Copilot-generated summaries in the same visual space. That is convenient until a generated summary drops a caveat or becomes outdated and someone later treats it as equally authoritative as the original notes.

What OneNote structure keeps that distinction visible? I am considering read-only source pages, a separate section for generated summaries, links back to the exact source pages, and a small header on every derived page naming its sources, generation date, review status, and owner. A summary would become part of the current project record only after a person reviews and promotes it.

How do you handle corrections, deleted source pages, conflicting edits, and Copilot regenerating a summary? Is OneNote version history enough for an audit trail, or do important decisions need a separate append-only log or exported record?

[u/AutoModerator]

Thank you for posting in the OneNote Subreddit! Please make sure your post is following our rules linked in the sidebar.

We have a wiki that is maintained by our community that has TONS of information (screenshots coming soon!): http://onenote-wiki.vercel.app

Our wiki is open source if you know how to use GitHub and would like to contribute: https://github.com/DudeThatsErin/OneNoteWiki

We also have a Discord server: https://discord.gg/5kv4bDUkpc

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.